I would assume you are getting used to seeing things again and again and
again and again...
UAC has given you lots of practice on that
Ο "Andre Da Costa[ActiveWin]" <andred25@hotmail.com> έγραψε στο μήνυμα
news:%23Owz3iiMIHA.4912@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> This has been posted in here numerous times now, just do a search before
> hitting the send button.
> --
> Andre
> Blog: http://adacosta.spaces.live.com
> My Vista Quickstart Guide:
> http://adacosta.spaces.live.com/blog...3DB!9709.entry
> "thai bear" <ber@df.kol> wrote in message
> news:474e108c@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>> vista is bad and slow... its the ultimate crap OS
>>
>> see this page for a comaprisson chart between xp sp3 and vista sp1....
>> the naysaers will drop dead eventually...
>>
>> http://www.neowin.net/news/main/07/1...ista-sp1-again
>>
>> exo.blog has at the request of their members re-run the original
>> OfficeBench test, this time with 2GB of RAM in the test system.
>> Unfortunately the outcome is unchanged bar a 4% improvement on the
>> previous score. One can argue that Windows XP system requirements are
>> quite a bit lower than its successor, and thats probably got a lot to do
>> with it. This, coupled with claims that Vista SP1 will not improve on
>> performance but will in fact be all about stability and reliability
>> instead, doesn't offer much hope for those people on older systems.
>>
>> Make of it what you will, I personally don't have performance issues at
>> all. I use Vista with 2GB of RAM and I have a Sandisk 2GB memory stick
>> that is used for the "Ready Boost" feature, maybe they should re-run the
>> test with that scenario.
>>
>> Chris Pirillo had this to say on all those negative articles surrounding
>> Windows Vista, enjoy!
>>
>>
>
>