"thai bear" <ber@df.kol> wrote in message
news:474e1a36@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>I would assume you are getting used to seeing things again and again and
>again and again...
> UAC has given you lots of practice on that
>
>
I would assume that you are used to being a mental retard.. Again and Again
and Again. You have made sure of that.
Just FYI
>
> Ο "Andre Da Costa[ActiveWin]" <andred25@hotmail.com> έγραψε στο μήνυμα
> news:%23Owz3iiMIHA.4912@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> This has been posted in here numerous times now, just do a search before
>> hitting the send button.
>> --
>> Andre
>> Blog: http://adacosta.spaces.live.com
>> My Vista Quickstart Guide:
>> http://adacosta.spaces.live.com/blog...3DB!9709.entry
>> "thai bear" <ber@df.kol> wrote in message
>> news:474e108c@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>>> vista is bad and slow... its the ultimate crap OS
>>>
>>> see this page for a comaprisson chart between xp sp3 and vista sp1....
>>> the naysaers will drop dead eventually...
>>>
>>> http://www.neowin.net/news/main/07/1...ista-sp1-again
>>>
>>> exo.blog has at the request of their members re-run the original
>>> OfficeBench test, this time with 2GB of RAM in the test system.
>>> Unfortunately the outcome is unchanged bar a 4% improvement on the
>>> previous score. One can argue that Windows XP system requirements are
>>> quite a bit lower than its successor, and thats probably got a lot to do
>>> with it. This, coupled with claims that Vista SP1 will not improve on
>>> performance but will in fact be all about stability and reliability
>>> instead, doesn't offer much hope for those people on older systems.
>>>
>>> Make of it what you will, I personally don't have performance issues at
>>> all. I use Vista with 2GB of RAM and I have a Sandisk 2GB memory stick
>>> that is used for the "Ready Boost" feature, maybe they should re-run the
>>> test with that scenario.
>>>
>>> Chris Pirillo had this to say on all those negative articles surrounding
>>> Windows Vista, enjoy!
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>