![]() |
|
|
#51 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Anyone use Be broadband?
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 10:37:36 +0000, Andy Burns wrote:
> On 09/12/2007 09:25, alexd wrote: > >> the router must be able to >> support RFC1483 bridged mode in order to work. > > Does that mean only a single ethernet device can be connected? No. -- <http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) () 20:58:06 up 28 days, 9:37, 2 users, load average: 0.07, 0.11, 0.15 Convergence, n: The act of using separate DSL circuits for voice and data |
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Anyone use Be broadband?
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 17:41:14 +0000, Eeyore
<> wrote: > > >tUMAz wrote: > >> Very good service broadband is better than my old VM cable srvice >> >> NO STM >> >> im 1.6km from exchange and i get a 30,5 Attenuation which indicates im 2.2km >> total line distance >> >> I get about 1500 sync > >I assume you mean 15,000 ? > >Graham You assume wrong. He's talking kB not kb .. |
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Anyone use Be broadband?
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 18:38:23 +0000, Eeyore wrote:
> Daffy Duck wrote: > >> Eeyore wrote: >>> Daffy Duck wrote: >>>> Andy Burns wrote: >>>>> Daffy Duck wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> So ALL ADSL suppliers,including Idnet,are misleading with their advertising >>>>>> then because,according to you,no one can get the 8meg they advertise. >>>>> >>>>> One of the better explanations of why that is correct can be found here >>>>> >>>> >>>> I'm not questioning that it's correct.I'm just pointing out that that makes >>>> their advertising (including his beloved Idnet) just as inaccurate as >>>> Eeyore claims VM's is. >>> >>> Actual broadband download speeds can vary ....... up to a maximum of 7.15 Mbps. >>> >> >> They sell it as up to 8 meg not as up to 7.15 meg,which appears to be what >> it really is.Putting 7.15 max in the small print doesn't alter what they >> claim is their headline speed in their various packages. That's misleading. > > The 7.15 Mbps is in the SAME size print you blind idiot. It's seperate from the package info and isn't,therefore,blindingly obvious....but i suppose that's OK for Idnet,it's just not OK for anyone else. |
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Anyone use Be broadband?
wrote: > Eeyore wrote: > >tUMAz wrote: > > > >> Very good service broadband is better than my old VM cable srvice > >> > >> NO STM > >> > >> im 1.6km from exchange and i get a 30,5 Attenuation which indicates im 2.2km > >> total line distance > >> > >> I get about 1500 sync > > > >I assume you mean 15,000 ? > > > You assume wrong. He's talking kB not kb I've never seen a sync rate quoted in kB before. Graham > > . |
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Anyone use Be broadband?
On 9 Dec, 17:16, "Bob Eager" <> wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 15:49:10 UTC, "tUMAz" <> > wrote: > > > Very good service broadband is better than my old VM cable srvice > > > NO STM > > > im 1.6km from exchange and i get a 30,5 Attenuation which indicates im 2.2km > > total line distance > > > I get about 1500 sync so i get about 1.54KB.s spoeed and 150KB/s upload > > Presumably you mean kb/s in both cases... > > > if your close to the exchange then its very good > > > further away you go the worse it gets simple as and this is with ALL > > broadband through BT cables > > I'm about 5km from the exchange, on a BT line. > > Currently syncing at 6.9 kb/s, which is fairly typical for me. 6.9 kb means 6.9 kilo bits. You would struggle to view text pages with a connection that slow. Kilobytes however sounds more likely and should be abbreviated to kB, or KB (the "B" is capitalised). |
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Anyone use Be broadband?
On 10/12/2007 05:17, bornfree wrote:
> 6.9 kb means 6.9 kilo bits. You would struggle to view text pages with > a connection that slow. That would have been a luxury in the days of 1200baud modems and text based bulletin boards ... |
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Anyone use Be broadband?
"bornfree" <> wrote in message news:... >I am thinking about moving to them when my contract is up... if you > use them could you share your opinion on the service (and the tech > support)? Very good service. Highly recommend them. With BE you can open a ticket via the website, and it gets responded to fairly quickly. |
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Anyone use Be broadband?
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:00:39 +0000, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >charles@notvalid.net wrote: > >> Eeyore wrote: >> >tUMAz wrote: >> > >> >> Very good service broadband is better than my old VM cable srvice >> >> >> >> NO STM >> >> >> >> im 1.6km from exchange and i get a 30,5 Attenuation which indicates im 2.2km >> >> total line distance >> >> >> >> I get about 1500 sync >> > >> >I assume you mean 15,000 ? >> >> >> You assume wrong. He's talking kB not kb > >I've never seen a sync rate quoted in kB before. > Ignorance is bliss ![]() |
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Anyone use Be broadband?
Andy Burns wrote: > On 10/12/2007 05:17, bornfree wrote: > > > 6.9 kb means 6.9 kilo bits. You would struggle to view text pages with > > a connection that slow. > > That would have been a luxury in the days of 1200baud modems and text > based bulletin boards ... My first browsing was with a 14.4 kbps modem. You couldn't get anything faster at the time. Graham |
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Anyone use Be broadband?
Andy Burns wrote: > On 10/12/2007 05:17, bornfree wrote: > > > 6.9 kb means 6.9 kilo bits. You would struggle to view text pages with > > a connection that slow. > > That would have been a luxury in the days of 1200baud modems and text > based bulletin boards ... My first browsing was with a 14.4 kbps modem. You couldn't get anything faster at the time. Graham |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
< Windows Help - MS Office Help - Hardware Support >
| New To Site? | Need Help? |