![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Anonymous Method vs. Anonymous Delegate
Is there any such thing as an "anonymous delegate"? I understand what an
anonymous method is, but I'm unclear of the concept of anonymous delegate (if it is even a valid term to be using). Is an "anoymous delegate" simply an anonymous method used in conjunction with a delegate declaration? Thanks! |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Anonymous Method vs. Anonymous Delegate
Robert,
I haven't heard the term "anonymous method" used at all. It's usually "anonymous delegate" since the only way you can access it is through a delegate instance. When the compiler comes across the anonymous delegate, it will create a method on a class which the delegate will then point to with a compiler-generated name. -- - Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] - mvp@spam.guard.caspershouse.com "Robert Howells" <A@B.COM> wrote in message news:eaxFuT5EIHA.4476@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > Is there any such thing as an "anonymous delegate"? I understand what an > anonymous method is, but I'm unclear of the concept of anonymous delegate > (if it is even a valid term to be using). Is an "anoymous delegate" simply > an anonymous method used in conjunction with a delegate declaration? > > Thanks! > |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Anonymous Method vs. Anonymous Delegate
Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] <mvp@spam.guard.caspershouse.com> wrote:
> I haven't heard the term "anonymous method" used at all. It's usually > "anonymous delegate" since the only way you can access it is through a > delegate instance. I'd say it's the other way round, actually. I've only ever seen "anonymous delegate" here on the newsgroup, used loosely. It doesn't appear anywhere in the spec. "Anonymous method" is the term used in the spec. "Anonymous function" is also used in the C# 3 spec to cover both anonymous methods and lambda expressions. > When the compiler comes across the anonymous delegate, it will create a > method on a class which the delegate will then point to with a > compiler-generated name. Nah, that's what happens when the compiler comes across an anonymous method ![]() -- Jon Skeet - <skeet@pobox.com> http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet If replying to the group, please do not mail me too |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Anonymous Method vs. Anonymous Delegate
<snip>
RE: > I'd say it's the other way round, actually. I've only ever seen > "anonymous delegate" here on the newsgroup, used loosely. It doesn't > appear anywhere in the spec. Google agrees with you. A search for... "anonymous method" returns 10,500,000 hits "anonymous delegate" returns 1,340,000 hits .... and we all know that Google is The Final Authority :-) |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |