TechTalkz.com Logo

Go Back   TechTalkz.com Technology & Computer Troubleshooting Forums > Tech Support Archives > Hardware

Notices

budget gaming PC performs well vs. high-end

Hardware


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21-10-2007, 07:34 AM   #21
Beladi Nasralla
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: budget gaming PC performs well vs. high-end



On Oct 21, 7:58 am, johns <> wrote:
> On Oct 20, 1:42 am, JAB <> wrote:
>
> > I wonder why they didn't ask you - go on have a think it about it?

>
> Simple .. they are ( professors ) ... shhh!
>
> not me


When a high-end card becomes morally obsolete, its price should
significantly fall. But _they_ do not want that to happen, because
they want you to buy their newest high-end card, and thus they want
you to part with your money.

  Reply With Quote
Old 21-10-2007, 02:32 PM   #22
JAB
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: budget gaming PC performs well vs. high-end

johns wrote:
> On Oct 20, 1:42 am, JAB <> wrote:
>> I wonder why they didn't ask you - go on have a think it about it?

>
> Simple .. they are ( professors ) ... shhh!
>
> not me
>


Not because you have views like your one about DX10 software mode as to
why one card is more 'powerful' than another. Maybe they know you talk
rubbish and that's the reason they didn't ask you - ever considered that?

That fact your you haven't been sacked yet can only lead me to believe
that your place of employment has absolutely nobody with more technical
knowledge than you which sort of narrows it down to either a nunnery or
it's a one man company.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21-10-2007, 08:35 PM   #23
Brabl
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: budget gaming PC performs well vs. high-end

On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 06:47:08 -0700, Beladi Nasralla
<> wrote:

> But there is a positive
>side to it, too. With a 1650x1050 screen, my games would run 20%
>slower than now ith a 1440x900 screen...


Do not assume that 20% more pixels necessarily means 20% slower. There
are a lot of factors at work there. 20% more pixels might run 40%
slower in some games. The performance drop off could be logarithmic
in some cases.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21-10-2007, 08:35 PM   #24
Walter Mitty
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: budget gaming PC performs well vs. high-end

Brabl <> writes:

> On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 06:47:08 -0700, Beladi Nasralla
> <> wrote:
>
>> But there is a positive
>>side to it, too. With a 1650x1050 screen, my games would run 20%
>>slower than now ith a 1440x900 screen...

>
> Do not assume that 20% more pixels necessarily means 20% slower. There
> are a lot of factors at work there. 20% more pixels might run 40%
> slower in some games. The performance drop off could be logarithmic
> in some cases.


And also don't forget that this is more like 35% more pixels.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23-10-2007, 04:36 AM   #25
johns
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: budget gaming PC performs well vs. high-end

It's a Nunnery.

johns

  Reply With Quote
Old 23-10-2007, 05:36 AM   #26
Walter Mitty
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: budget gaming PC performs well vs. high-end

johns <> writes:

> It's a Nunnery.
>
> johns


What is?
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



< Windows Help - MS Office Help - Hardware Support >


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 07:14 AM.


vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Copyright © 2005-2009, TechTalkz.com. All Rights Reserved - Privacy Policy
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional