I've been playing around.

ml2mst

ChrisC wrote:

> just an observation.

Or flamebait?

I use both DE's on a regular base and neither of them frequently crash.

--
|_|0|_| Marti T. van Lin
|_|_|0|
|0|0|0|

Mark South

On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 06:27:05 +0000, Dan C wrote:

> On 2007-12-07, ChrisC wrote:
>> Does any one notice that KDE is less stable than Gnome. I find Gnome
>> crashes less and is a lot more solid. This isn't Gnome Vs KDE debate,
>> just an observation.
>
> I'd score this a 1.25 (out of 10) on the Troll-O-Meter.

Trolls get weaker towards the weekend as their beer levels drop.

So, did we ever definitively decide which is better, emacs or vi?

Mark
--
Signature uses openbsd so as to be able to use mg

Wim Cossement

Mark South wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 06:27:05 +0000, Dan C wrote:
>
>> On 2007-12-07, ChrisC wrote:
>>> Does any one notice that KDE is less stable than Gnome. I find Gnome
>>> crashes less and is a lot more solid. This isn't Gnome Vs KDE debate,
>>> just an observation.
>> I'd score this a 1.25 (out of 10) on the Troll-O-Meter.
>
> Trolls get weaker towards the weekend as their beer levels drop.

What kind of beer?
Here Jupiler is my favourite but you should all know Stella Artois,
sicne we keep the best and export the inferior ones...

> So, did we ever definitively decide which is better, emacs or vi?

No man, but I must say Gentoo is a really good distribution and the
others are used by a bunch of tree huggin' hippie crap! :-p

> Mark

--
I'm sick of following my dreams!
I'll just ask where they're going and hook up with them later...

Mitch Hedberg

Martin Gregorie

Wim Cossement wrote:
>
> What kind of beer?
> Here Jupiler is my favourite but you should all know Stella Artois,
> sicne we keep the best and export the inferior ones...
>
I thought you guys turned up your noses at anything except Trappist or
Abbaiale beers.

I was happy to drink Jupilier (especially in the Falstaff) when I was
working in Brussels but a Belgian friend classed anything that wasn't
Trappist or Abbaile as "industrial beer" and wouldn't touch it. I also
liked Chimay Bleu a lot.


--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Es***, UK
org |

alexd

ChrisC wrote:

> Does any one notice that KDE is less stable than Gnome. I find Gnome
> crashes less and is a lot more solid.

What do you mean by 'crashes'? KDE comprises many individual components, and
it seems a bit far fetched that so many processes would crash at once. What
application are you having problems with?

--
<http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) ()
13:47:13 up 26 days, 2:26, 2 users, load average: 0.11, 0.22, 0.18
Convergence, n: The act of using separate DSL circuits for voice and data

Daniel James

In article news:<.clara.net>, ChrisC wrote:
> Does any one notice that KDE is less stable than Gnome. I find Gnome
> crashes less and is a lot more solid.

I've used both and never noticed any particular instability in either.

I did once get into an extraordinary mess trying to run some Gnome apps
under KDE, and ended up with KDE trying to run an infinite number of
copies of Nautilus ... but that was some years ago. I haven't had
significant problems with either since.

I find KDE has slightly more useful functionality than Gnome, but it
also has more complexity and more useLESS functionality. A
trimmed-down, leaner, KDE would be better than either.

[Note: some newsgroups trimmed as my news server doesn't carry them,
and won't post to them]

--
Cheers,
Daniel.