I've been playing around.

Darrell Stec

Mark South wrote:

> On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 06:27:05 +0000, Dan C wrote:
>
>> On 2007-12-07, ChrisC wrote:
>>> Does any one notice that KDE is less stable than Gnome. I find Gnome
>>> crashes less and is a lot more solid. This isn't Gnome Vs KDE debate,
>>> just an observation.
>>
>> I'd score this a 1.25 (out of 10) on the Troll-O-Meter.
>
> Trolls get weaker towards the weekend as their beer levels drop.
>
> So, did we ever definitively decide which is better, emacs or vi?
>
> Mark

No. The discussion got sidelined by the Nano advocates.

--
Later,
Darrell Stec

Webpage Sorcery

We Put the Magic in Your Webpages

CBFalconer

George Peatty wrote:
> Mark South <mark.south@null.invalid> wrote:
>
>> So, did we ever definitively decide which is better, emacs or vi?
>
> Such mystical, transcendental questions have no solution. It's
> like asking, what is the value of pi?

Well, you can always ask two questions, typified by:

Is pi > 3.1415 ANS yes
Is pi < 3.1415 ANS no
Is pi > 3.1416 ANS no
Is pi < 3.1416 ANS yes

and develop pi to any desired accuracy from the answer set. :-)

--
Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
<http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from

CBFalconer

ray wrote:
> George Peatty wrote:
>> Mark South <mark.south@null.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> So, did we ever definitively decide which is better, emacs or vi?
>>
>> Such mystical, transcendental questions have no solution. It's
>> like asking, what is the value of pi?
>
> 3.141592653589+

3.14159265358979+

If you add a 3 I don't know if you need a + or - following.

--
Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
<http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from