![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Getting Started! - Guide | Blog | Videos | Gallery | Members List | Social Groups | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Stability
I've been trying to place an old computer back into service as a video
player, piping the signal to a largish CRT TV set. Not because I have any particular need for it, just because I wanted to see if I could. The computer is some seven years old, with an 800 MHz Duron processor and 512MB of RAM. It should do the job just fine, not taxing its abilities at all. Mandriva 2008 installs just fine - or seems to. I know, because I've done it several times now. The problem seems to be one of instability. Sometimes things work, sometimes they don't. Different times I've had Kaffeine, KDE, and Mandriva Update all crash, leaving me locked up with a hard reset the only way out. This computer used to belong to my brother, who used it with Windows 98SE until his death four years ago. It was a home-built machine, sold on Ebay after the builder received a better one for Christmas. My brother claimed Windows was stable for him, but a comment of his made me wonder. I bought the computer I'm using now a few months before his death, and he remarked once that he hoped the AMD Athlon XP processor worked better than his Duron. I dismissed that at the time as being Windows' fault, but now I'm not so sure. Considering the problems I've had with Mandriva, I now think there's some obscure hardware problem somewhere, and always has been. Too many people jump to the conclusion that the OS is bad, when it probably isn't so much at fault at all. It would be easy to blame the Linux software, if it wasn't so rock-solid on my newer, more capable main computer. It was certainly easy to blame Windows four years ago, even though I knew from personal experience that Windows 98SE, properly managed, can be very stable. I had a point in here somewhere when I started writing this. I guess it's that we all need to try very hard to avoid all that conclusion-jumping. TJ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Stability
TJ wrote:
> I've been trying to place an old computer back into service as a video > player, piping the signal to a largish CRT TV set. Not because I have > any particular need for it, just because I wanted to see if I could. > > The computer is some seven years old, with an 800 MHz Duron processor > and 512MB of RAM. It should do the job just fine, not taxing its > abilities at all. Mandriva 2008 installs just fine - or seems to. I > know, because I've done it several times now. The problem seems to be > one of instability. Sometimes things work, sometimes they don't. > Different times I've had Kaffeine, KDE, and Mandriva Update all crash, > leaving me locked up with a hard reset the only way out. > > This computer used to belong to my brother, who used it with Windows > 98SE until his death four years ago. It was a home-built machine, sold > on Ebay after the builder received a better one for Christmas. My > brother claimed Windows was stable for him, but a comment of his made me > wonder. I bought the computer I'm using now a few months before his > death, and he remarked once that he hoped the AMD Athlon XP processor > worked better than his Duron. I dismissed that at the time as being > Windows' fault, but now I'm not so sure. Considering the problems I've > had with Mandriva, I now think there's some obscure hardware problem > somewhere, and always has been. > > Too many people jump to the conclusion that the OS is bad, when it > probably isn't so much at fault at all. It would be easy to blame the > Linux software, if it wasn't so rock-solid on my newer, more capable > main computer. It was certainly easy to blame Windows four years ago, > even though I knew from personal experience that Windows 98SE, properly > managed, can be very stable. > > I had a point in here somewhere when I started writing this. I guess > it's that we all need to try very hard to avoid all that > conclusion-jumping. > > TJ > Minor point, but have you tried the latest stable multimedia kernel? 2.6.17.14-mm-desktop-9mdv The 2.6.22.9-desktop-2mdv and 2.6.22.12-desktop-1mdv kernels both are somewhat prone to lockup when I am simultaneously running Firefox, Thunderbird, and Amarok. The incidence is lessened by using the mm kernel above and Rhythmbox, but does not cure the problem completely. I upgraded on my 64-bit system rather than do a clean install, and so much is working nicely that I am reluctant to wipe out all settings and do a fresh install, but I suspect that old settings or libraries are causing problems. Cheers! jim b. -- UNIX is not user-unfriendly; it merely expects users to be computer-friendly. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Stability
On 2007-12-21, TJ <TJ@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> I've been trying to place an old computer back into service as a video > player, piping the signal to a largish CRT TV set. Not because I have > any particular need for it, just because I wanted to see if I could. > > The computer is some seven years old, with an 800 MHz Duron processor > and 512MB of RAM. It should do the job just fine, not taxing its > abilities at all. Mandriva 2008 installs just fine - or seems to. I > know, because I've done it several times now. The problem seems to be > one of instability. Sometimes things work, sometimes they don't. > Different times I've had Kaffeine, KDE, and Mandriva Update all crash, > leaving me locked up with a hard reset the only way out. > > This computer used to belong to my brother, who used it with Windows > 98SE until his death four years ago. It was a home-built machine, sold > on Ebay after the builder received a better one for Christmas. My > brother claimed Windows was stable for him, but a comment of his made me > wonder. I bought the computer I'm using now a few months before his > death, and he remarked once that he hoped the AMD Athlon XP processor > worked better than his Duron. I dismissed that at the time as being > Windows' fault, but now I'm not so sure. Considering the problems I've > had with Mandriva, I now think there's some obscure hardware problem > somewhere, and always has been. > > Too many people jump to the conclusion that the OS is bad, when it > probably isn't so much at fault at all. It would be easy to blame the > Linux software, if it wasn't so rock-solid on my newer, more capable > main computer. It was certainly easy to blame Windows four years ago, > even though I knew from personal experience that Windows 98SE, properly > managed, can be very stable. > > I had a point in here somewhere when I started writing this. I guess > it's that we all need to try very hard to avoid all that > conclusion-jumping. Have you run memtest86 overnight (or better, for a few days) to rule out RAM problems? Over the years, I have seen a _few_ Mandriva kernels and/or X releases that were unstable, especially when using GLX. I have 2008.0 on only one testing machine, so I don't yet know how stable 2008.0 is on my hardware. (So far, the installation on the testing machine has been fine.) -- Robert Riches spamtrap42@verizon.net (Yes, that is one of my email addresses.) |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Stability
TJ wrote:
> The computer is some seven years old, with an 800 MHz Duron processor > and 512MB of RAM. It should do the job just fine, not taxing its > abilities at all. Mandriva 2008 installs just fine - or seems to. I would suggest two things - run Memtest86 overnight to eliminate the possibility of faulty RAM, and perhaps run one of the hard disk test programs to check that it isn't bad. I would check the RAM first... C. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Stability
On 2007-12-21, Robert M. Riches Jr. <spamtrap42@verizon.net> wrote:
> > Have you run memtest86 overnight (or better, for a few days) > to rule out RAM problems? Agree (well overnight anyway )+ Prime95 running under wine (select torture test option) (Can sometimes pick up things that memtest may miss) Lordy |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Stability
TJ wrote:
> The computer is some seven years old, with an 800 MHz Duron processor > and 512MB of RAM. It should do the job just fine, not taxing its > abilities at all. Mandriva 2008 installs just fine - or seems to. I would suggest two things - run Memtest86 overnight to eliminate the possibility of faulty RAM, and perhaps run one of the hard disk test programs to check that it isn't bad. I would check the RAM first... C. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Stability
TJ wrote:
> I've been trying to place an old computer back into service as a video > player, piping the signal to a largish CRT TV set. Not because I have > any particular need for it, just because I wanted to see if I could. > > The computer is some seven years old, with an 800 MHz Duron processor > and 512MB of RAM. I use exact same system on a daily basis. The only problem I experience is that most movies do not play smoothly. mplayer reports too slow CPU, and even after tweaking the playback with various mplayer options and using different codecs, it still doesn't play smoothly enough. xine sometimes works a bit better, but also has its problems. I think the hardware may be a tad too slow for smooth playback. -- artix http://www.abstractart.ws _Abstract Art Directory_ |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Stability
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 19:03:45 +0100, artix wrote:
> TJ wrote: >> I've been trying to place an old computer back into service as a video >> player, piping the signal to a largish CRT TV set. Not because I have >> any particular need for it, just because I wanted to see if I could. >> >> The computer is some seven years old, with an 800 MHz Duron processor >> and 512MB of RAM. > > I use exact same system on a daily basis. The only problem I experience > is that most movies do not play smoothly. mplayer reports too slow CPU, > and even after tweaking the playback with various mplayer options and > using different codecs, it still doesn't play smoothly enough. xine > sometimes works a bit better, but also has its problems. I think the > hardware may be a tad too slow for smooth playback. It should be ok for SD playback. It's certainly way too slow for anything like HD, even 720P HD. I ran a Duron 1600 clock to 2000MHz and that took over 80% usage doing HD. About 10% for SD. -- Want the ultimate in free OTA SD/HDTV Recorder? http://mythtv.org My Tivo Experience http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/tivo.htm Tivo HD/S3 compared http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/mythtivo.htm AMD cpu help http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Stability
TJ wrote:
> I've been trying to place an old computer back into service as a video > player, piping the signal to a largish CRT TV set. Not because I have > any particular need for it, just because I wanted to see if I could. > > The computer is some seven years old, with an 800 MHz Duron processor > and 512MB of RAM. I use exact same system on a daily basis. The only problem I experience is that most movies do not play smoothly. mplayer reports too slow CPU, and even after tweaking the playback with various mplayer options and using different codecs, it still doesn't play smoothly enough. xine sometimes works a bit better, but also has its problems. I think the hardware may be a tad too slow for smooth playback. -- artix http://www.abstractart.ws _Abstract Art Directory_ |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Stability
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 19:03:45 +0100, artix wrote:
> TJ wrote: >> I've been trying to place an old computer back into service as a video >> player, piping the signal to a largish CRT TV set. Not because I have >> any particular need for it, just because I wanted to see if I could. >> >> The computer is some seven years old, with an 800 MHz Duron processor >> and 512MB of RAM. > > I use exact same system on a daily basis. The only problem I experience > is that most movies do not play smoothly. mplayer reports too slow CPU, > and even after tweaking the playback with various mplayer options and > using different codecs, it still doesn't play smoothly enough. xine > sometimes works a bit better, but also has its problems. I think the > hardware may be a tad too slow for smooth playback. It should be ok for SD playback. It's certainly way too slow for anything like HD, even 720P HD. I ran a Duron 1600 clock to 2000MHz and that took over 80% usage doing HD. About 10% for SD. -- Want the ultimate in free OTA SD/HDTV Recorder? http://mythtv.org My Tivo Experience http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/tivo.htm Tivo HD/S3 compared http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/mythtivo.htm AMD cpu help http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
< Home - Windows Help - MS Office Help - Hardware Support >
| New To Site? | Need Help? |