![]() |
|
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Outlook 2003 / Vista bug??
jbrc <jbrc2@hotmail.com> wrote:
> What was the original problem? I can't find any entry in the > newsgroup with this subject. > I have a problem with Outlook hanging under Vista so thought this may > be the same. Not at all the same. -- Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook] |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Outlook 2003 / Vista bug??
Have you solved? "Brian Tillman" wrote: > "JSmith" wrote: > > > The problem occurs on messages that are sent to me with ONLY "BCC" > > addresses. > > > > When I receive the message on my Outlook 2003/XP machine, the TO > > field shows "undisclosed recipients", and the message displays > > correctly. The same message on the Outlook 2003/Vista HP machine > > has the TO field empty, and the message is displayed uninterpreted > > (with HTML codes showing for HTML messages, etc.), and with all of > > the headers displayed. > > Microsoft would like me to send them screen shots of the problem and whether > or not Word is designated as the mail editor. Forward those things to me > ate the address with which I'm posting and I'll pass them on. > -- > Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook] > > |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Outlook 2003 / Vista bug??
bardo <bardo@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> Have you solved? Not yet. -- Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook] |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Outlook 2003 / Vista bug??
An exact replica of the error can be found here:
http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/Sho...&PostID=849645 and the error is quite well documented all over the internet - google it. Hopefully this will eliminate the need for screen shots. Any assistance you can offer will be appreciated - especially by your contact at Microsoft. Leighsa "Brian Tillman" wrote: > bardo <bardo@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > > > Have you solved? > > Not yet. > -- > Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook] > |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|