![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Getting Started! - Guide | Blog | Videos | Gallery | Members List | Social Groups | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Let me take my foot out of my backside...
"Phil Weldon" <not.disclosed@example.com> wrote in message news:13qfgsej90f7ecb@corp.supernews.com... > Well, just to add to your troubles, with in the next 12 months the > 'Nehalem' > CPU line comes out; new socket new motherboards, new chipset, new memory > required. So perhaps you should keep in mind that you may really, really > want a new new system less than a year after THIS new system. I'd suggest > a > relatively inexpensive motherboard and CPU, and be satisfied by a good > overclock. That way you will be more willing to go for the next latest > and > greatest. > I tend to stay just behind the bleeding edge when it comes to putting systems together. I'm not a heavy gamer, but I do a bit of work in digital photography and MATLAB simulations. I've found that staying with something that's had a chance to be wrung out has worked well for me. My AI7 is going on 4-1/2 years. I expect my next choice to go at least this long. > Back to your original post: > "Stable in OC. I'm willing to get 90% of the theoretical best OC state > if the board can do so and run like clockwork." > There IS no 'theoretical best OC'. Each CPU produced can have > different > overclocking potential. There is a probability curve for the overclock > that > can be expected, but no guarantees. > Understood. I guess the point I wanted to make was that I would rather move toward a board that had a decent OC record without enetring into the area of being able to push a chip a little bit more than another board - at the expense of higher risk. I recognize a lot of success in OC'ing is based on a given CPU, but some boards have absolutely poor records in being able to OC while others are at the top end of the scale for serious OC junkies. I'm looking to be juuust a bit behind that front line. > "Able to migrate slowly to new components." > Well, WHAT new components? There isn't much to be gained with new > CD/DVD drives, but that really isn't a problem because almost ANY new > motherboard can support two IDE ATA drives. DDR2 RAM will work in any > motherboard. ISA sockets have already gone away, and PCI slots are going > away. If you end up using two video cards, it is unlikely ANY > motherboard > will have more than one PCI slot available. There just aren't that many > components other than memory, CPU, and video card to plug into a > motherboard > any more. > Looking to get a new system up quickly, meaning I will use my older DDR2 and IDE/PATA drives, and will migrate to "newer" (for me) components as necessary. > Since you wish to overclock, I'd suggest you look through posts to this > newsgroup in the last year and choose a motherboard based on those posts. That's how I got to the ones I did. If you can recommend something that you think would be comparable to the IP35 Pro, P5K-E, or P35-DS3 - or for my purposes better - at less cost I would be happy to know about it. -Tony |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Let me take my foot out of my backside...
> Is there anything (apart from price) that would lead me away from the IP35
> Pro or P5K-E? Just the fact that Newegg is currently out of stock on that particular item....however, they usually get stock fairly quickly and there are other vendors. |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Let me take my foot out of my backside...
'Tony' wrote:
| That's how I got to the ones I did. If you can recommend something that you | think would be comparable to the IP35 Pro, P5K-E, or P35-DS3 - or for my | purposes better - at less cost I would be happy to know about it. _____ Well, my current overclocking motherboard is an EVGA 680i. I am well satisfied with the performance, BUT. 1. nVidia's nTune has a 'hands-off' overclocking function; it is worse than useless. Not only does it hang after making no progress, but the so-called 'system load' that it uses is hardly more than 10 or 15 percent load (a 3D window that covers only about 1/6 the screen. ) On the other hand, I don't think ANY 'hands-off' overclocking function from ANY motherboard manufacturer is any more useful. 2. nVida's chipsets allow for changing more overclocking parameters than any other chipset (seven voltage, three frequency reference, one CPU Clock : Memory Clock ratio, twelve memory timing, and a partridge in a pear tree.) On the other hand, the manual is none too clear, and no further information can be weaseled out of nVidia or EVGA. At the moment I have an E4300 installed running at 2.7 GHz with a core voltage below specification and DDR2-1066 memory running at DDR2-1200. The maximum overclock is limited by CPU temperature as I need a high CPU core voltage to get above ~ 3.1 GHz, and the bother of better cooling isn't worth the trouble with an E4300. 3. Nice motherboard cooling system (nVidia reference board); a Southbridge heatsink connected by a heatpipe to the Northbridge heatsink that has fins and a fan. 4. Two gigabit LAN ports 5. Two PCI-e X16 slots, one PCI-e X 8 slot, two PCI-e X 1 slots, one PCI-e X 8 slot (physical X 16), two PCI slots, one IDE ATA connector, one floppy connector, six SATA/SATA3 connectors (w/RAID , six USB 2.0 connectors, 1 IEEE1394a connector, and an SPDIF. 6. The 680i is expensive ($197 US) as is the newer EVGA 780i motherboard ($250 US). The EVGA 680i LT ($170 US) drops the PCI-e X 8 slot and one of the two Gigabit LAN ports. The MSI P6N SLI-FI 650i nVidia chipset motherboard is $85 US at newegg.com has a similar connector set to the EVGA 680i LT, but adds a second IDE ATA connector. {I've never owned an MSI motherboard; just aBit, Intel, and now EVGA.} The choice I face in continuing to overclock is EITHER replace the E4300 with a Q6400 and stick with that for a few years OR keep the E4300 until 'Nehalem' and replace the CPU, memory, and motherboard AND ON THE THIRD HAND fool around with water cooling (already have the components) and put off making a decision as long as possible B^) Phil Weldon "Tony" <none@none.com> wrote in message news:t5qdnXbEBLLfSjranZ2dnUVZ_ryqnZ2d@comcast.com. .. | | "Phil Weldon" <not.disclosed@example.com> wrote in message | news:13qfgsej90f7ecb@corp.supernews.com... | > Well, just to add to your troubles, with in the next 12 months the | > 'Nehalem' | > CPU line comes out; new socket new motherboards, new chipset, new memory | > required. So perhaps you should keep in mind that you may really, really | > want a new new system less than a year after THIS new system. I'd suggest | > a | > relatively inexpensive motherboard and CPU, and be satisfied by a good | > overclock. That way you will be more willing to go for the next latest | > and | > greatest. | > | | I tend to stay just behind the bleeding edge when it comes to putting | systems together. I'm not a heavy gamer, but I do a bit of work in digital | photography and MATLAB simulations. I've found that staying with something | that's had a chance to be wrung out has worked well for me. My AI7 is going | on 4-1/2 years. I expect my next choice to go at least this long. | | > Back to your original post: | > "Stable in OC. I'm willing to get 90% of the theoretical best OC state | > if the board can do so and run like clockwork." | > There IS no 'theoretical best OC'. Each CPU produced can have | > different | > overclocking potential. There is a probability curve for the overclock | > that | > can be expected, but no guarantees. | > | | Understood. I guess the point I wanted to make was that I would rather move | toward a board that had a decent OC record without enetring into the area of | being able to push a chip a little bit more than another board - at the | expense of higher risk. I recognize a lot of success in OC'ing is based on a | given CPU, but some boards have absolutely poor records in being able to OC | while others are at the top end of the scale for serious OC junkies. I'm | looking to be juuust a bit behind that front line. | | > "Able to migrate slowly to new components." | > Well, WHAT new components? There isn't much to be gained with new | > CD/DVD drives, but that really isn't a problem because almost ANY new | > motherboard can support two IDE ATA drives. DDR2 RAM will work in any | > motherboard. ISA sockets have already gone away, and PCI slots are going | > away. If you end up using two video cards, it is unlikely ANY | > motherboard | > will have more than one PCI slot available. There just aren't that many | > components other than memory, CPU, and video card to plug into a | > motherboard | > any more. | > | | Looking to get a new system up quickly, meaning I will use my older DDR2 and | IDE/PATA drives, and will migrate to "newer" (for me) components as | necessary. | | > Since you wish to overclock, I'd suggest you look through posts to this | > newsgroup in the last year and choose a motherboard based on those posts. | | That's how I got to the ones I did. If you can recommend something that you | think would be comparable to the IP35 Pro, P5K-E, or P35-DS3 - or for my | purposes better - at less cost I would be happy to know about it. | | -Tony | | |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Need help picking a new MB
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Need help picking a new MB
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:13:24 GMT, Howard Goldstein <hgoldste@mpcs.com> wrote:
: If P35 overclock then DFI. For ex http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813136043 : Arrrgh I meant this model http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...2E16813136037R But not the open box |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
< Home - Windows Help - MS Office Help - Hardware Support >
| New To Site? | Need Help? |