|
|
01-12-2007, 07:56 PM
|
#151 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: NO!! Oxford is FULL of crap - as ALWAYS
In news:EeK3j.71973$YL5.27005@newssvr29.news.prodigy. net,
ed <news@no-atwistedweb-spam.com> typed: > "Oxford" <linuxlovesosx@superart.com> wrote in message > news:linuxlovesosx-A4B1C2.23222628112007@mpls-nnrp-03.inet.qwest.net... >> News <News@Groups.com> wrote: >> >>> ...And can roam seamlessly between cells/APs... >> >> as you can with apple's wireless base stations since the beginning of >> 802.11 time... >> >> http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=58596 > > uh, yeah, but the basestations need to be connected together with > ethernet... > > <snip> Minor insignificant detail. Oxford might be working on a plan to implement this everywhere and for free. lol |
|
|
01-12-2007, 07:56 PM
|
#152 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: NO!! Oxford is FULL of crap - as ALWAYS
"IMHO IIRC" <NOSPAM@NOSPAM.NOSPAM> wrote in message news:PJL3j.7513$KK1.4959@newsfe24.lga... > In news:EeK3j.71973$YL5.27005@newssvr29.news.prodigy. net, > ed <news@no-atwistedweb-spam.com> typed: >> "Oxford" <linuxlovesosx@superart.com> wrote in message >> news:linuxlovesosx-A4B1C2.23222628112007@mpls-nnrp-03.inet.qwest.net... >>> News <News@Groups.com> wrote: >>> >>>> ...And can roam seamlessly between cells/APs... >>> >>> as you can with apple's wireless base stations since the beginning of >>> 802.11 time... >>> >>> http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=58596 >> >> uh, yeah, but the basestations need to be connected together with >> ethernet... >> >> <snip> > > Minor insignificant detail. Oxford might be working on a plan to > implement > this everywhere and for free. lol > > > > Yeah, if it's "hip" enough, whether it loses money or not won't matter. He'll lose money on every installation and every minute someone uses it but he'll make it up in volume (volume of shares of stock sold to idiots, that is). |
|
|
|
01-12-2007, 07:57 PM
|
#153 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: NO!! Oxford is FULL of crap - as ALWAYS
Rashputin wrote: > "IMHO IIRC" <NOSPAM@NOSPAM.NOSPAM> wrote in message > news:PJL3j.7513$KK1.4959@newsfe24.lga... > >>In news:EeK3j.71973$YL5.27005@newssvr29.news.prodigy. net, >>ed <news@no-atwistedweb-spam.com> typed: >> >>>"Oxford" <linuxlovesosx@superart.com> wrote in message >>>news:linuxlovesosx-A4B1C2.23222628112007@mpls-nnrp-03.inet.qwest.net... >>> >>>>News <News@Groups.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>...And can roam seamlessly between cells/APs... >>>> >>>>as you can with apple's wireless base stations since the beginning of >>>>802.11 time... >>>> >>>>http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=58596 >>> >>>uh, yeah, but the basestations need to be connected together with >>>ethernet... >>> >>><snip> >> >>Minor insignificant detail. Oxford might be working on a plan to >>implement >>this everywhere and for free. lol >> >> >> >> > > > Yeah, if it's "hip" enough, whether it loses money or not won't matter. > He'll lose money on every installation and every minute someone uses it but > he'll make it up in volume (volume of shares of stock sold to idiots, that > is). > > And if it's "hip" enough, the fashionistas and fashion victims will assume away the pain of poor performance. More KoolAid, please. |
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
