|
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-12-2007, 04:19 PM
|
#61 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Patientline on the ropes :-))
On 03/12/2007 00:31, Owain wrote:
> Different criteria apply to the NHS. ^ rest of |
|
|
04-12-2007, 01:44 PM
|
#62 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Patientline on the ropes :-))
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 21:38:58 -0000, "Hog" <.uk>
wrote: >PeterT wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:12:10 -0000, "Hog" <.uk> >> wrote: >> >>> Nomen Nescio wrote: >>>> "R. Mark Clayton" <> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Patientline and their vile business model are on their death bed, >>>>> with little hope of survival. >>>>> >>>>> Putting the prices up resulted in reduced revenue (whereas advice >>>>> from this group was to lower prices in actually increase revenue) >>>>> with the shares now down to less than 1p see: - >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> does it hurt - only when I am ROTFLMAO! >>>> >>>> good riddance! >>>> ***** the b******s! >>> >>> It wasn't Patient Line that ****ed the business model. It was the UK >>> Govmint and regional NHS Trusts that did that. >>> HTH. >> >> Do you wish to expand on your reasoning? > >Not really. It well enough documented history. Well, as it was Patientline's business model its fauilure is down to them - nobody else to blame -- Cheers Peter |
|
|
|
04-12-2007, 01:58 PM
|
#63 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Patientline on the ropes :-))
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 21:38:58 -0000, "Hog" <.uk>
wrote: >PeterT wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:12:10 -0000, "Hog" <.uk> >> wrote: >> >>> Nomen Nescio wrote: >>>> "R. Mark Clayton" <> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Patientline and their vile business model are on their death bed, >>>>> with little hope of survival. >>>>> >>>>> Putting the prices up resulted in reduced revenue (whereas advice >>>>> from this group was to lower prices in actually increase revenue) >>>>> with the shares now down to less than 1p see: - >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> does it hurt - only when I am ROTFLMAO! >>>> >>>> good riddance! >>>> ***** the b******s! >>> >>> It wasn't Patient Line that ****ed the business model. It was the UK >>> Govmint and regional NHS Trusts that did that. >>> HTH. >> >> Do you wish to expand on your reasoning? > >Not really. It well enough documented history. Well, as it was Patientline's business model its fauilure is down to them - nobody else to blame -- Cheers Peter |
|
|
|
04-12-2007, 02:14 PM
|
#64 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Patientline on the ropes :-))
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 21:38:58 -0000, "Hog" <.uk>
wrote: >PeterT wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:12:10 -0000, "Hog" <.uk> >> wrote: >> >>> Nomen Nescio wrote: >>>> "R. Mark Clayton" <> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Patientline and their vile business model are on their death bed, >>>>> with little hope of survival. >>>>> >>>>> Putting the prices up resulted in reduced revenue (whereas advice >>>>> from this group was to lower prices in actually increase revenue) >>>>> with the shares now down to less than 1p see: - >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> does it hurt - only when I am ROTFLMAO! >>>> >>>> good riddance! >>>> ***** the b******s! >>> >>> It wasn't Patient Line that ****ed the business model. It was the UK >>> Govmint and regional NHS Trusts that did that. >>> HTH. >> >> Do you wish to expand on your reasoning? > >Not really. It well enough documented history. Well, as it was Patientline's business model its fauilure is down to them - nobody else to blame -- Cheers Peter |
|
|
|
04-12-2007, 02:19 PM
|
#65 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Patientline on the ropes :-))
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 21:38:58 -0000, "Hog" <.uk>
wrote: >PeterT wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:12:10 -0000, "Hog" <.uk> >> wrote: >> >>> Nomen Nescio wrote: >>>> "R. Mark Clayton" <> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Patientline and their vile business model are on their death bed, >>>>> with little hope of survival. >>>>> >>>>> Putting the prices up resulted in reduced revenue (whereas advice >>>>> from this group was to lower prices in actually increase revenue) >>>>> with the shares now down to less than 1p see: - >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> does it hurt - only when I am ROTFLMAO! >>>> >>>> good riddance! >>>> ***** the b******s! >>> >>> It wasn't Patient Line that ****ed the business model. It was the UK >>> Govmint and regional NHS Trusts that did that. >>> HTH. >> >> Do you wish to expand on your reasoning? > >Not really. It well enough documented history. Well, as it was Patientline's business model its fauilure is down to them - nobody else to blame -- Cheers Peter |
|
|
|
04-12-2007, 02:21 PM
|
#66 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Patientline on the ropes :-))
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 21:38:58 -0000, "Hog" <.uk>
wrote: >PeterT wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:12:10 -0000, "Hog" <.uk> >> wrote: >> >>> Nomen Nescio wrote: >>>> "R. Mark Clayton" <> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Patientline and their vile business model are on their death bed, >>>>> with little hope of survival. >>>>> >>>>> Putting the prices up resulted in reduced revenue (whereas advice >>>>> from this group was to lower prices in actually increase revenue) >>>>> with the shares now down to less than 1p see: - >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> does it hurt - only when I am ROTFLMAO! >>>> >>>> good riddance! >>>> ***** the b******s! >>> >>> It wasn't Patient Line that ****ed the business model. It was the UK >>> Govmint and regional NHS Trusts that did that. >>> HTH. >> >> Do you wish to expand on your reasoning? > >Not really. It well enough documented history. Well, as it was Patientline's business model its fauilure is down to them - nobody else to blame -- Cheers Peter |
|
|
|
04-12-2007, 02:26 PM
|
#67 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Patientline on the ropes :-))
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 21:38:58 -0000, "Hog" <.uk>
wrote: >PeterT wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:12:10 -0000, "Hog" <.uk> >> wrote: >> >>> Nomen Nescio wrote: >>>> "R. Mark Clayton" <> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Patientline and their vile business model are on their death bed, >>>>> with little hope of survival. >>>>> >>>>> Putting the prices up resulted in reduced revenue (whereas advice >>>>> from this group was to lower prices in actually increase revenue) >>>>> with the shares now down to less than 1p see: - >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> does it hurt - only when I am ROTFLMAO! >>>> >>>> good riddance! >>>> ***** the b******s! >>> >>> It wasn't Patient Line that ****ed the business model. It was the UK >>> Govmint and regional NHS Trusts that did that. >>> HTH. >> >> Do you wish to expand on your reasoning? > >Not really. It well enough documented history. Well, as it was Patientline's business model its fauilure is down to them - nobody else to blame -- Cheers Peter |
|
|
|
05-12-2007, 03:18 AM
|
#68 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Patientline on the ropes :-))
PeterT wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 21:38:58 -0000, "Hog" <.uk> > wrote: > >> PeterT wrote: >>> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:12:10 -0000, "Hog" >>> <.uk> wrote: >>> >>>> Nomen Nescio wrote: >>>>> "R. Mark Clayton" <> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Patientline and their vile business model are on their death bed, >>>>>> with little hope of survival. >>>>>> >>>>>> Putting the prices up resulted in reduced revenue (whereas advice >>>>>> from this group was to lower prices in actually increase revenue) >>>>>> with the shares now down to less than 1p see: - >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> does it hurt - only when I am ROTFLMAO! >>>>> >>>>> good riddance! >>>>> ***** the b******s! >>>> >>>> It wasn't Patient Line that ****ed the business model. It was the >>>> UK Govmint and regional NHS Trusts that did that. >>>> HTH. >>> >>> Do you wish to expand on your reasoning? >> >> Not really. It well enough documented history. > > Well, as it was Patientline's business model its fauilure is down to > them - nobody else to blame That much is patently true. If the Trusts hadn't tried to get their pound of flesh out of the thing it might just have been ok though. -- Hog '03 ST4S '96 Bastard12 '89 R100RS '81 XS650 '78 RD400 |
|
|
|
05-12-2007, 04:21 AM
|
#69 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Patientline on the ropes :-))
PeterT wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 21:38:58 -0000, "Hog" <.uk> > wrote: > >> PeterT wrote: >>> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:12:10 -0000, "Hog" >>> <.uk> wrote: >>> >>>> Nomen Nescio wrote: >>>>> "R. Mark Clayton" <> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Patientline and their vile business model are on their death bed, >>>>>> with little hope of survival. >>>>>> >>>>>> Putting the prices up resulted in reduced revenue (whereas advice >>>>>> from this group was to lower prices in actually increase revenue) >>>>>> with the shares now down to less than 1p see: - >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> does it hurt - only when I am ROTFLMAO! >>>>> >>>>> good riddance! >>>>> ***** the b******s! >>>> >>>> It wasn't Patient Line that ****ed the business model. It was the >>>> UK Govmint and regional NHS Trusts that did that. >>>> HTH. >>> >>> Do you wish to expand on your reasoning? >> >> Not really. It well enough documented history. > > Well, as it was Patientline's business model its fauilure is down to > them - nobody else to blame That much is patently true. If the Trusts hadn't tried to get their pound of flesh out of the thing it might just have been ok though. -- Hog '03 ST4S '96 Bastard12 '89 R100RS '81 XS650 '78 RD400 |
|
|
|
05-12-2007, 04:41 AM
|
#70 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Patientline on the ropes :-))
PeterT wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 21:38:58 -0000, "Hog" <.uk> > wrote: > >> PeterT wrote: >>> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:12:10 -0000, "Hog" >>> <.uk> wrote: >>> >>>> Nomen Nescio wrote: >>>>> "R. Mark Clayton" <> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Patientline and their vile business model are on their death bed, >>>>>> with little hope of survival. >>>>>> >>>>>> Putting the prices up resulted in reduced revenue (whereas advice >>>>>> from this group was to lower prices in actually increase revenue) >>>>>> with the shares now down to less than 1p see: - >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> does it hurt - only when I am ROTFLMAO! >>>>> >>>>> good riddance! >>>>> ***** the b******s! >>>> >>>> It wasn't Patient Line that ****ed the business model. It was the >>>> UK Govmint and regional NHS Trusts that did that. >>>> HTH. >>> >>> Do you wish to expand on your reasoning? >> >> Not really. It well enough documented history. > > Well, as it was Patientline's business model its fauilure is down to > them - nobody else to blame That much is patently true. If the Trusts hadn't tried to get their pound of flesh out of the thing it might just have been ok though. -- Hog '03 ST4S '96 Bastard12 '89 R100RS '81 XS650 '78 RD400 |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
< Windows Help - MS Office Help - Hardware Support >
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
Linear Mode
