![]() |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#121 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: "the jammers revenge on mobile prattlers" in the Times
Nomen Nescio wrote:
> Make it legal for people to buy them with very short ranges. That's > all most commuters really need anyway. All most burglars and muggers really need either. |
|
|
|
#122 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: "the jammers revenge on mobile prattlers" in the Times
In article <Xns99FDF257E8F26rabbiteergmailcom@216.196.109.145 >, David
Buttery <> scribeth thus >furnessvale <> wrote in >news:: > >>> But how would you know? Recently I heard a man on a train ring >>> someone and spend the first minute so saying that they were on the >>> train and that it was raining a little bit. Prattle, yes. After that, >>> he asked how his daughter was doing, and the implication was that she >>> was quite ill in hospital. Not prattle. I wouldn't have liked to have >>> cut him off because of that unpromising first minute! > >> Sounds like he had decided his priorities for himself. > >I think that's unfair. Not so long ago I had to make a phone call about a >very serious situation involving someone close to me. I found that a bit of >gentle, undemanding chat first was the only way I could settle my mind >enough to do the next bit of the talk, which it was extremely important I >got right. I reckon I spent longer than a minute on the "prattle" phase. > Point is that you can make a call on a mobile in a normal voiced discreet manner, but there are a LOT who can't and have to shout think their sooo bloody important!.... -- Tony Sayer |
|
|
|
#123 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: "the jammers revenge on mobile prattlers" in the Times
Nomen Nescio wrote:
> Make it legal for people to buy them with very short ranges. That's > all most commuters really need anyway. All most burglars and muggers really need either. |
|
|
|
#124 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: "the jammers revenge on mobile prattlers" in the Times
In article <Xns99FDF257E8F26rabbiteergmailcom@216.196.109.145 >, David
Buttery <> scribeth thus >furnessvale <> wrote in >news:: > >>> But how would you know? Recently I heard a man on a train ring >>> someone and spend the first minute so saying that they were on the >>> train and that it was raining a little bit. Prattle, yes. After that, >>> he asked how his daughter was doing, and the implication was that she >>> was quite ill in hospital. Not prattle. I wouldn't have liked to have >>> cut him off because of that unpromising first minute! > >> Sounds like he had decided his priorities for himself. > >I think that's unfair. Not so long ago I had to make a phone call about a >very serious situation involving someone close to me. I found that a bit of >gentle, undemanding chat first was the only way I could settle my mind >enough to do the next bit of the talk, which it was extremely important I >got right. I reckon I spent longer than a minute on the "prattle" phase. > Point is that you can make a call on a mobile in a normal voiced discreet manner, but there are a LOT who can't and have to shout think their sooo bloody important!.... -- Tony Sayer |
|
|
|
#125 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: "the jammers revenge on mobile prattlers" in the Times
In article <Xns99FDF257E8F26rabbiteergmailcom@216.196.109.145 >, David
Buttery <> scribeth thus >furnessvale <> wrote in >news:: > >>> But how would you know? Recently I heard a man on a train ring >>> someone and spend the first minute so saying that they were on the >>> train and that it was raining a little bit. Prattle, yes. After that, >>> he asked how his daughter was doing, and the implication was that she >>> was quite ill in hospital. Not prattle. I wouldn't have liked to have >>> cut him off because of that unpromising first minute! > >> Sounds like he had decided his priorities for himself. > >I think that's unfair. Not so long ago I had to make a phone call about a >very serious situation involving someone close to me. I found that a bit of >gentle, undemanding chat first was the only way I could settle my mind >enough to do the next bit of the talk, which it was extremely important I >got right. I reckon I spent longer than a minute on the "prattle" phase. > Point is that you can make a call on a mobile in a normal voiced discreet manner, but there are a LOT who can't and have to shout think their sooo bloody important!.... -- Tony Sayer |
|
|
|
#126 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: "the jammers revenge on mobile prattlers" in the Times
Nomen Nescio wrote:
> Make it legal for people to buy them with very short ranges. That's > all most commuters really need anyway. All most burglars and muggers really need either. |
|
|
|
#127 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: "the jammers revenge on mobile prattlers" in the Times
Nomen Nescio wrote:
> Make it legal for people to buy them with very short ranges. That's > all most commuters really need anyway. All most burglars and muggers really need either. |
|
|
|
#128 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: "the jammers revenge on mobile prattlers" in the Times
In article <Xns99FDF257E8F26rabbiteergmailcom@216.196.109.145 >, David
Buttery <> scribeth thus >furnessvale <> wrote in >news:: > >>> But how would you know? Recently I heard a man on a train ring >>> someone and spend the first minute so saying that they were on the >>> train and that it was raining a little bit. Prattle, yes. After that, >>> he asked how his daughter was doing, and the implication was that she >>> was quite ill in hospital. Not prattle. I wouldn't have liked to have >>> cut him off because of that unpromising first minute! > >> Sounds like he had decided his priorities for himself. > >I think that's unfair. Not so long ago I had to make a phone call about a >very serious situation involving someone close to me. I found that a bit of >gentle, undemanding chat first was the only way I could settle my mind >enough to do the next bit of the talk, which it was extremely important I >got right. I reckon I spent longer than a minute on the "prattle" phase. > Point is that you can make a call on a mobile in a normal voiced discreet manner, but there are a LOT who can't and have to shout think their sooo bloody important!.... -- Tony Sayer |
|
|
|
#129 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: "the jammers revenge on mobile prattlers" in the Times
Nomen Nescio wrote:
> Make it legal for people to buy them with very short ranges. That's > all most commuters really need anyway. All most burglars and muggers really need either. |
|
|
|
#130 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: "the jammers revenge on mobile prattlers" in the Times
In article <Xns99FDF257E8F26rabbiteergmailcom@216.196.109.145 >, David
Buttery <> scribeth thus >furnessvale <> wrote in >news:: > >>> But how would you know? Recently I heard a man on a train ring >>> someone and spend the first minute so saying that they were on the >>> train and that it was raining a little bit. Prattle, yes. After that, >>> he asked how his daughter was doing, and the implication was that she >>> was quite ill in hospital. Not prattle. I wouldn't have liked to have >>> cut him off because of that unpromising first minute! > >> Sounds like he had decided his priorities for himself. > >I think that's unfair. Not so long ago I had to make a phone call about a >very serious situation involving someone close to me. I found that a bit of >gentle, undemanding chat first was the only way I could settle my mind >enough to do the next bit of the talk, which it was extremely important I >got right. I reckon I spent longer than a minute on the "prattle" phase. > Point is that you can make a call on a mobile in a normal voiced discreet manner, but there are a LOT who can't and have to shout think their sooo bloody important!.... -- Tony Sayer |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
< Windows Help - MS Office Help - Hardware Support >
| New To Site? | Need Help? |