![]() |
|
|
#21 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Unhappy with new phone
On 10/12/2007 10:32, wrote:
> David Taylor <.uk> wrote: > >> A clock that works without mains power _or_ batteries? > > It's called a button cell, That isn't WITHOUT batteries is it? |
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Unhappy with new phone
Andy Burns <.uk> wrote:
> On 10/12/2007 10:32, wrote: > > > David Taylor <.uk> wrote: > > > >> A clock that works without mains power _or_ batteries? > > > > It's called a button cell, > > That isn't WITHOUT batteries is it? > ..... and where did I say "without batteries"? -- Chris Green |
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Unhappy with new phone
On 10/12/2007 12:15, wrote:
> Andy Burns <.uk> wrote: >> On 10/12/2007 10:32, wrote: >> >>> David Taylor <.uk> wrote: >>> >>>> A clock that works without mains power _or_ batteries? >>> It's called a button cell, >> That isn't WITHOUT batteries is it? >> > .... and where did I say "without batteries"? You didn't, but the post you replied to did, perhaps you ought to have replied to an earlier message in the thread? |
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Unhappy with new phone
On 2007-12-10, <.uk> wrote:
> David Taylor <.uk> wrote: >> On 2007-12-08, <.uk> wrote: >> > Nowhere <.uk> wrote: >> >> >> >> I have checked and it seems that in fact the phone directory is saved >> >> but the date/time is lost Why this should be I do not know >> >> >> > That odd stupidity seems common to lots of equipment. We have a Sony >> > stereo that remembers *all* of its settings except the time when it >> > loses power. The most annoying bit is that (like videos) the time >> > flashes at you when the power comes back. >> > >> > OK, so you can't "remember" the time, you need a chip that will keep >> > ticking as it were but it surely can't be all that difficult. >> >> A clock that works without mains power _or_ batteries? It is >> very difficult. >> >> Invent one, and become very rich... >> >> (No springs allowed, either) >> > It's called a button cell, just about every PC has had this ability > since the IBM PC appeared (15 or 20 years?). Bzzt. Try reading what I write next time. > Your PC doesn't forget > the time when you turn it off does it! Well no, but it has a battery in it. The phone in question won't lose the time either, if it has a backup battery in it. -- David Taylor |
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Unhappy with new phone
On 2007-12-10, <.uk> wrote:
> Andy Burns <.uk> wrote: >> On 10/12/2007 10:32, wrote: >> >> > David Taylor <.uk> wrote: >> > >> >> A clock that works without mains power _or_ batteries? >> > >> > It's called a button cell, >> >> That isn't WITHOUT batteries is it? >> > .... and where did I say "without batteries"? Er? You said "It's called a button cell" in response to "A clock that works without mains power _or_ batteries?". What exactly _did_ you mean? -- David Taylor |
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Unhappy with new phone
On 2007-12-10, <.uk> wrote:
> David Taylor <.uk> wrote: >> On 2007-12-08, <.uk> wrote: >> > Nowhere <.uk> wrote: >> >> >> >> I have checked and it seems that in fact the phone directory is saved >> >> but the date/time is lost Why this should be I do not know >> >> >> > That odd stupidity seems common to lots of equipment. We have a Sony >> > stereo that remembers *all* of its settings except the time when it >> > loses power. The most annoying bit is that (like videos) the time >> > flashes at you when the power comes back. >> > >> > OK, so you can't "remember" the time, you need a chip that will keep >> > ticking as it were but it surely can't be all that difficult. >> >> A clock that works without mains power _or_ batteries? It is >> very difficult. >> >> Invent one, and become very rich... >> >> (No springs allowed, either) >> > It's called a button cell, just about every PC has had this ability > since the IBM PC appeared (15 or 20 years?). Bzzt. Try reading what I write next time. > Your PC doesn't forget > the time when you turn it off does it! Well no, but it has a battery in it. The phone in question won't lose the time either, if it has a backup battery in it. -- David Taylor |
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Unhappy with new phone
On 2007-12-10, <.uk> wrote:
> Andy Burns <.uk> wrote: >> On 10/12/2007 10:32, wrote: >> >> > David Taylor <.uk> wrote: >> > >> >> A clock that works without mains power _or_ batteries? >> > >> > It's called a button cell, >> >> That isn't WITHOUT batteries is it? >> > .... and where did I say "without batteries"? Er? You said "It's called a button cell" in response to "A clock that works without mains power _or_ batteries?". What exactly _did_ you mean? -- David Taylor |
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Unhappy with new phone
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:32:34 +0000, tinnews wrote:
> It's called a button cell, just about every PC has had this ability > since the IBM PC appeared (15 or 20 years?). Your PC doesn't forget the > time when you turn it off does it! > > My latest camera doesn't either (it says it will keep the time going for > 24 hours or so). If it's only 24 hours or so, then it's probably a supercap, not a button cell. -- <http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) () 14:34:10 up 29 days, 3:13, 2 users, load average: 0.21, 0.27, 0.22 Convergence, n: The act of using separate DSL circuits for voice and data |
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Unhappy with new phone
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:32:34 +0000, tinnews wrote:
> It's called a button cell, just about every PC has had this ability > since the IBM PC appeared (15 or 20 years?). Your PC doesn't forget the > time when you turn it off does it! > > My latest camera doesn't either (it says it will keep the time going for > 24 hours or so). If it's only 24 hours or so, then it's probably a supercap, not a button cell. -- <http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) () 14:34:10 up 29 days, 3:13, 2 users, load average: 0.21, 0.27, 0.22 Convergence, n: The act of using separate DSL circuits for voice and data |
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Unhappy with new phone
David Taylor <.uk> wrote:
> On 2007-12-10, <.uk> wrote: > > Andy Burns <.uk> wrote: > >> On 10/12/2007 10:32, wrote: > >> > >> > David Taylor <.uk> wrote: > >> > > >> >> A clock that works without mains power _or_ batteries? > >> > > >> > It's called a button cell, > >> > >> That isn't WITHOUT batteries is it? > >> > > .... and where did I say "without batteries"? > > Er? > > You said "It's called a button cell" in response to "A clock that > works without mains power _or_ batteries?". > > What exactly _did_ you mean? > .... that I wanted my radio (video, whatever) to remember the time as I originally said. I don't mind in the slightest *how* it does it! As I said PCs manage very well to do what I want. -- Chris Green |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
< Windows Help - MS Office Help - Hardware Support >
| New To Site? | Need Help? |