Apple To Own Wireless 700Mhz Network

Oxford

George <george@nospam.invalid> wrote:

> When you author a post as you did with no attribution you are taking
> full responsibility for the accuracy because they are *your words*.

go cry me a river george. you forget, i simply don't care as long as the
information is interesting. it was, so i posted it. deal with it.

CozmicDebris

Oxford <> wrote in news:linuxlovesosx-
:

> George <george@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>
>> When you author a post as you did with no attribution you are taking
>> full responsibility for the accuracy because they are *your words*.
>
> go cry me a river george. you forget, i simply don't care as long as the
> information is interesting. it was, so i posted it. deal with it.
>

And there lies the problem, newbie- most of us would rather post something
factual, as opposed to "interesting". The fact that you posted it all
simply shows that you know nothing about the subject.

Oxford

DTC <> wrote:

> Oxford wrote:
> > why are you so obsessed with me?
>
> Why are you so obsessed with making yerself look like a fool, fool?

you don't have to get nasty about it. I'm a helpful person filled with
exciting news about the future of the cell industry.

apple is going to totally transform it, so I'm here to keep you up to
date.

yes, you're welcome!

Jon

Oxford wrote:
> Jack Hamilton <> wrote:
>
>> Oxford <> wrote:
>>
>>> i'll be sure to let the author know your thoughts.
>> Why don't you just tell us who the author was?
>
> it's no great secret, DTC had nothing better to do so he dug around and
> found it.
>
> Yahoo message board -
> Posted by "ace_92029"
> "http://profiles.yahoo.com/ace_92029
>
> i did feel like digging it up, so now go ***** at the author, not me. i
> was just the carrier pigeon.
Yes, and that guy is SO CREDITABLE!

What I am saying is that you should not believe everything you hear on
the internet and usenet

Jon

Oxford wrote:
> "Ness Net" <.spam.nessnet.com> wrote:
>
>>> Well, here's the word. Apple with or without Google/AT&T will bid on the
>>> 700Mhz spectrum that will be auctioned by the US Government in January
>>> of 2008.
>> As we all know by now - Oxtard is (always) wrong.
>>
>> Here is the real deal...
>>
>>
>>
>> Google is making the necessary preparations to bid for wireless spectrum in
>> an auction be held in the U.S. in January
>>
>> The company is planning to finance that bid alone, without partners,
>> according to a report in The Wall Street Journal.
>
> You are forgetting that Apple and Google are partners in many areas,
> Eric even sits on Apple's Board of Directors so what Steve says, Eric
> does.
So? They don't need Apple to slow them down anymore.
>
> Google simply doesn't have any experience in hardware, nor any sales
> experience to go it alone, and while an mutual Apple/Google bid is
> possible. Apple can easily outbid Google if needed.
No, Apple cannot outbid google.

And guess what, GOOGLE HAS SALES EXPERIENCE!

Oxford

"Ness Net" <.spam.nessnet.com> wrote:

> > Well, here's the word. Apple with or without Google/AT&T will bid on the
> > 700Mhz spectrum that will be auctioned by the US Government in January
> > of 2008.
>
> As we all know by now - Oxtard is (always) wrong.
>
> Here is the real deal...
>
>
>
> Google is making the necessary preparations to bid for wireless spectrum in
> an auction be held in the U.S. in January
>
> The company is planning to finance that bid alone, without partners,
> according to a report in The Wall Street Journal.

You are forgetting that Apple and Google are partners in many areas,
Eric even sits on Apple's Board of Directors so what Steve says, Eric
does.

Google simply doesn't have any experience in hardware, nor any sales
experience to go it alone, and while an mutual Apple/Google bid is
possible. Apple can easily outbid Google if needed.

As Todd mentioned the deadline for submitting bids is coming up soon.

Apple would probably use a shell company to protect the use until the
iPhone using this band is ready.

MacWorld is coming up very soon, only 58 days away! So we should know
something by that morning. (the Keynote is on the 15th)

Oxford

DTC <> wrote:

> Oxford wrote:
> > Well, here's the word. Apple with or without Google/AT&T will bid on the
> > 700Mhz spectrum that will be auctioned by the US Government in January
> > of 2008. They need to buy about 22 Mhz of the spectrum (60Mhz is being
> > sold) to cover the entire country.
>
> Yahoo message board -
> Posted by "ace_92029"
> "http://profiles.yahoo.com/ace_92029
>
> [quote]
> Well, here's the word. Apple with or without Google/AT&T will bid on the
> 700Mhz spectrum that will be auctioned by the US government in January
> of 2008. They need to buy about 22 Mhz of the spectrum (60Mhz is being
> sold) to cover the entire country.
>
> > The 700Mhz frequency is Gold in the sky! A wireless internet will one
> > day be all there is. Whoever owns this beach front property owns the
> > cell phone world. And no one will ever sell this to a competitor. Apple
> > must buy in or control this area if they are to control their cell phone
> > experience. And here's the best part.
> > As this network is already built out for analogue TV, it will cost
> > little to change things for Wimaxx. Instant nationwide network that goes
> > through walls way easier than any other Mhz band.
>
>
> Authored by: By Cade Metz in San Francisco
> [quote]
> The FCC calls the 700-MHz band "beachfront property." As TV stations
> vacate this wireless real estate, making the move to digital
> transmission, it could potentially house a nationwide wireless network
> that's faster than WiFi and more adept at passing through walls.
>
> Would you like salsa to go with the egg on yer face?

why are you so obsessed with me?

Oxford

"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <> wrote:

> > And your point is? Everything points to you as the poster.
>
> Oxfart posts something here, and when questioned about its source, goes
> to that forum and says "but look, it's published elsewhere"--when in
> reality that "forum" simply reposts whatever anyone posts to the Usenet.

they are not talking about that elmo. what i posted came from yahoo's
message board, not usenet. learn to read.

DTC

Oxford wrote:
> why are you so obsessed with me?

Why are you so obsessed with making yerself look like a fool, fool?

Oxford

Jack Hamilton <> wrote:

> Oxford <> wrote:
>
> >i'll be sure to let the author know your thoughts.
>
> Why don't you just tell us who the author was?

it's no great secret, DTC had nothing better to do so he dug around and
found it.

Yahoo message board -
Posted by "ace_92029"
"http://profiles.yahoo.com/ace_92029

i did feel like digging it up, so now go ***** at the author, not me. i
was just the carrier pigeon.