CozmicDebris

Oxford <linuxlovesosx@superart.com> wrote in news:linuxlovesosx-
40E270.13435801122007@mpls-nnrp-04.inet.qwest.net:

> News <News@Groups.com> wrote:
>
>> > you need to keep in mind Google and Apple are partners, so it's not a
>> > case of Apple against Google... it's a case of how Google will set
>> > things up for Apple if Google decides to bid, and visa-versa.
>>
>> Please share your info on bidder collusion with the SEC, DOJ and FCC.
>
> neither Apple nor Google hold a majority of the cell market at this time
> so the SEC, DOJ, FCC don't have any say in the matter.

And you just showed that you know nothing about spectrum bidding- we'll add
it to the long list of things you are clueless about. What you are
suggesting is bidder collusion and is against the law. Market share has
nothing to do with it, moron.


>
> you are talking if AT&T and Verizon did a tandem bid, not Apple & Google.
>
> please learn about business before you post again.
>

Yes you should.

Elmo P. Shagnasty

In article
<linuxlovesosx-91A44B.15500901122007@mpls-nnrp-04.inet.qwest.net>,
Oxford <linuxlovesosx@superart.com> wrote:

> > Please tell us AGAIN how Steve Jobs doesn't "pre-announce" anything.
> >
> > Remember, your words are recorded for posterity.
> >
> > What will you say down the road when you want to backtrack on your claim?
>
> the iphone wasn't pre-announced it was simply announced. big difference.

Pray tell, what is the difference?

I mean, I agree with you. But the general unwashed masses take
"pre-announced" to mean "announced prior to its availability".

Steve Jobs announces products far, far before their availability so as
to drum up excitement among those same unwashed masses.

What do YOU mean by "it wasn't pre-announced, it was merely announced"?

You will ignore this, because you are now out of options.