![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Motorola w755 - casual review
Just got a Moto w755 and am well pleased. This phone is very similar to the
V3m, but improved in just about every way, e.g. nicer looking menus/themes, more responsive buttons, touch buttons on the face to toggle Bluetooth and vibrate, and better Bluetooth reception with my H700 headset. It uses the same USB connector for charging and PC connection as the V3m, so chargers/cables are compatible. It is also similar enough in size that my V3m leather case works. Additionally there is a 2.5mm headphone jack so the phone can be charged while using a wired headset. The phone is supported by the latest version of Motorola Phone Tools (v5) so I was able to easily transfer my contact list and calendar from the V3m. This phone is free when ordered on the web with a 2 year contract renewal combined with the "new every two" discount (well, you do have to pay sales tax). Great! |
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Motorola w755 - casual review
How are voice quality, volume, signal reception, and battery life?
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Motorola w755 - casual review
Cinderlane@webtv.net (Cinder Lane) wrote:
> How are voice quality, volume, signal reception, and battery life? I don't know about most of this but the battery is larger than the V3m so I'm sure the battery life is longer, here's what I found: V755: Usage Time: Up to 220 Minutes OR Standby Time: Up to 390 Hours Compare that with the V3m: Usage Time: Up to 200 minutes OR Standby Time: Up to 325 Hours. And the E815: Usage Time: Up to 280 minutes OR Standby Time: Up to 300 Hours. Standby time on the E815 may be an error, mine seems to be longer than my V3m? -- XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org |
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Motorola w755 - casual review
> How are voice quality, volume, signal reception, and battery life?
> It's too early to say anything about battery life, but voice quality, volume and signal reception are as good as the V3m and actually much better when using my BT headset - I could never get reliable BT reception with the V3m. Other positives: You can change the wallpaper on the inside and outside screens independently. The digital clock on the outside screen has a larger font and is more readable then the V3m, especially if your don't use a wallpaper. Negatives: Few useful ringers. I don't use music ringers and that leaves just Provincial and Standard. Wallpapers are also in short supply. I was able to hack the V3m with a kit from Cellcables.com to enable ringer and wallpaper customization, but the w755 is not support yet. |
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Motorola w755 - casual review
"Victek" <Victek@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> How are voice quality, volume, signal reception, and battery >> life? >> > It's too early to say anything about battery life Not really, there are posted specs on Verizon's website and they can be used as a guideline for relative performance. As I posted before, battery life should be better than the V9m and worse than the E815 based on Motorola's figures. -- XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org |
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Motorola w755 - casual review
>>> How are voice quality, volume, signal reception, and battery
>>> life? >>> >> It's too early to say anything about battery life > > Not really, there are posted specs on Verizon's website and they can be > used as a guideline for relative performance. As I posted before, > battery life should be better than the V9m and worse than the E815 > based on Motorola's figures. > > > -- > XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups > The Usenet Improvement Project: > http://improve-usenet.org > I should have said: "it's too early to say anything about battery life from my personal experience". |
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Motorola w755 - casual review
I very eagerly awaited the release of the 755 last month.
When I finally got my hands on one at the store I was kind of disappointed. I find the chromed-plastic look of the frame looks cheesy to me, and the display is quite a bit smaller than my Razr. I do concur with the look of the display and the responsiveness of the software. I'm just sad they wouldn't spend the buck extra per phone to make it look solid and "snazzy". It looked like a winner from a distance, now I'm not so sure. I think the 755 is a good replacement for the v325, but a downgrade from the v3m. I'm holding onto the Razr a little while longer to see what else comes out. Dean "Victek" <Victek@invalid.invalid> wrote in message news:g39ke9$3aa$1@registered.motzarella.org... > Just got a Moto w755 and am well pleased. This phone is very similar to > the V3m, but improved in just about every way, e.g. nicer looking > menus/themes, more responsive buttons, touch buttons on the face to toggle > Bluetooth and vibrate, and better Bluetooth reception with my H700 > headset. It uses the same USB connector for charging and PC connection as > the V3m, so chargers/cables are compatible. It is also similar enough in > size that my V3m leather case works. Additionally there is a 2.5mm > headphone jack so the phone can be charged while using a wired headset. > The phone is supported by the latest version of Motorola Phone Tools (v5) > so I was able to easily transfer my contact list and calendar from the > V3m. This phone is free when ordered on the web with a 2 year contract > renewal combined with the "new every two" discount (well, you do have to > pay sales tax). Great! |
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Motorola w755 - casual review
"Dean" <dean173***********> wrote in message news:4859f55c$0$7334$607ed4bc@cv.net... > I very eagerly awaited the release of the 755 last month. > > When I finally got my hands on one at the store I was kind of > disappointed. > I find the chromed-plastic look of the frame looks cheesy to me, and the > display is quite a bit smaller than my Razr. > > I do concur with the look of the display and the responsiveness of the > software. I'm just sad they wouldn't spend the buck extra per phone to > make > it look solid and "snazzy". It looked like a winner from a distance, now > I'm > not so sure. > > I think the 755 is a good replacement for the v325, but a downgrade from > the > v3m. I'm holding onto the Razr a little while longer to see what else > comes > out. > > Dean > You're correct that the w755 main display is smaller. That's mainly due to the fact that the phone is more narrow then the V3m. I hadn't noticed it though because the text and images are so clear. I do notice that I have gotten used the size and heft of the V3m and the w755 feels small in my hand. I expect I'll get used to that and forget about it, but we'll see. There are so many great improvements in the w755 that I wouldn't want to go back to my V3m at this point. The ability to turn on/off Bluetooth and toggle vibrate mode from the touch buttons on the front is just "killer" (does anyone say killer anymore?) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
< Home - Windows Help - MS Office Help - Hardware Support >
| New To Site? | Need Help? |