Ping --> Sinclair of #DCA (Dark Coders Alliance)

4Q

Ant wrote:
> "4Q" wrote:
> > Ant wrote:
> >> I've seen a some of your archived hex dumps of zipped web pages.
> >
> > Yes... Vista still has good old reliable
> > 'debug'
>
> Amazing. For some reason I thought MS had stopped supporting 16 bit
> apps on Vista.
>

Man you're kidding this is 64bit turbo
debug ;]]


> > And as you've probably seen from the
> > alt.comp.virus.source.code many of the
> > uuencoded files were automatically
> > deleted by Google.
>
> Google doen't archive binaries (e.g. uuencoded attachments).
>

I'm talking about embedding ascii
armoured code within the message body.


> > Mind you most 21st century GUI only
> > people would be freaked out by debug's
> > friendly user interface! "-" *HAHA*
>
> They should try 'edlin' if they want user friendly! Does Vista still
> have that?

edlin was always weak! debug was always
a great tool (as history shows us).
If you've got debug and a bit of
ingenuity you've got a bootstrap into
hax0r land.

4Q

4Q

Ant wrote:
> "4Q" wrote:
> > Ant wrote:
> >> I've seen a some of your archived hex dumps of zipped web pages.
> >
> > Yes... Vista still has good old reliable
> > 'debug'
>
> Amazing. For some reason I thought MS had stopped supporting 16 bit
> apps on Vista.
>

Man you're kidding this is 64bit turbo
debug ;]]


> > And as you've probably seen from the
> > alt.comp.virus.source.code many of the
> > uuencoded files were automatically
> > deleted by Google.
>
> Google doen't archive binaries (e.g. uuencoded attachments).
>

I'm talking about embedding ascii
armoured code within the message body.


> > Mind you most 21st century GUI only
> > people would be freaked out by debug's
> > friendly user interface! "-" *HAHA*
>
> They should try 'edlin' if they want user friendly! Does Vista still
> have that?

edlin was always weak! debug was always
a great tool (as history shows us).
If you've got debug and a bit of
ingenuity you've got a bootstrap into
hax0r land.

4Q

4Q

Ant wrote:
> "4Q" wrote:
> > Ant wrote:
> >> I've seen a some of your archived hex dumps of zipped web pages.
> >
> > Yes... Vista still has good old reliable
> > 'debug'
>
> Amazing. For some reason I thought MS had stopped supporting 16 bit
> apps on Vista.
>

Man you're kidding this is 64bit turbo
debug ;]]


> > And as you've probably seen from the
> > alt.comp.virus.source.code many of the
> > uuencoded files were automatically
> > deleted by Google.
>
> Google doen't archive binaries (e.g. uuencoded attachments).
>

I'm talking about embedding ascii
armoured code within the message body.


> > Mind you most 21st century GUI only
> > people would be freaked out by debug's
> > friendly user interface! "-" *HAHA*
>
> They should try 'edlin' if they want user friendly! Does Vista still
> have that?

edlin was always weak! debug was always
a great tool (as history shows us).
If you've got debug and a bit of
ingenuity you've got a bootstrap into
hax0r land.

4Q

4Q

Ant wrote:
> "4Q" wrote:
> > Ant wrote:
> >> I've seen a some of your archived hex dumps of zipped web pages.
> >
> > Yes... Vista still has good old reliable
> > 'debug'
>
> Amazing. For some reason I thought MS had stopped supporting 16 bit
> apps on Vista.
>

Man you're kidding this is 64bit turbo
debug ;]]


> > And as you've probably seen from the
> > alt.comp.virus.source.code many of the
> > uuencoded files were automatically
> > deleted by Google.
>
> Google doen't archive binaries (e.g. uuencoded attachments).
>

I'm talking about embedding ascii
armoured code within the message body.


> > Mind you most 21st century GUI only
> > people would be freaked out by debug's
> > friendly user interface! "-" *HAHA*
>
> They should try 'edlin' if they want user friendly! Does Vista still
> have that?

edlin was always weak! debug was always
a great tool (as history shows us).
If you've got debug and a bit of
ingenuity you've got a bootstrap into
hax0r land.

4Q

4Q

Ant wrote:
> "4Q" wrote:
> > Ant wrote:
> >> I've seen a some of your archived hex dumps of zipped web pages.
> >
> > Yes... Vista still has good old reliable
> > 'debug'
>
> Amazing. For some reason I thought MS had stopped supporting 16 bit
> apps on Vista.
>

Man you're kidding this is 64bit turbo
debug ;]]


> > And as you've probably seen from the
> > alt.comp.virus.source.code many of the
> > uuencoded files were automatically
> > deleted by Google.
>
> Google doen't archive binaries (e.g. uuencoded attachments).
>

I'm talking about embedding ascii
armoured code within the message body.


> > Mind you most 21st century GUI only
> > people would be freaked out by debug's
> > friendly user interface! "-" *HAHA*
>
> They should try 'edlin' if they want user friendly! Does Vista still
> have that?

edlin was always weak! debug was always
a great tool (as history shows us).
If you've got debug and a bit of
ingenuity you've got a bootstrap into
hax0r land.

4Q

4Q

Ant wrote:
> "4Q" wrote:
> > Ant wrote:
> >> I've seen a some of your archived hex dumps of zipped web pages.
> >
> > Yes... Vista still has good old reliable
> > 'debug'
>
> Amazing. For some reason I thought MS had stopped supporting 16 bit
> apps on Vista.
>

Man you're kidding this is 64bit turbo
debug ;]]


> > And as you've probably seen from the
> > alt.comp.virus.source.code many of the
> > uuencoded files were automatically
> > deleted by Google.
>
> Google doen't archive binaries (e.g. uuencoded attachments).
>

I'm talking about embedding ascii
armoured code within the message body.


> > Mind you most 21st century GUI only
> > people would be freaked out by debug's
> > friendly user interface! "-" *HAHA*
>
> They should try 'edlin' if they want user friendly! Does Vista still
> have that?

edlin was always weak! debug was always
a great tool (as history shows us).
If you've got debug and a bit of
ingenuity you've got a bootstrap into
hax0r land.

4Q

4Q

Ant wrote:
> "4Q" wrote:
> > Ant wrote:
> >> I've seen a some of your archived hex dumps of zipped web pages.
> >
> > Yes... Vista still has good old reliable
> > 'debug'
>
> Amazing. For some reason I thought MS had stopped supporting 16 bit
> apps on Vista.
>

Man you're kidding this is 64bit turbo
debug ;]]


> > And as you've probably seen from the
> > alt.comp.virus.source.code many of the
> > uuencoded files were automatically
> > deleted by Google.
>
> Google doen't archive binaries (e.g. uuencoded attachments).
>

I'm talking about embedding ascii
armoured code within the message body.


> > Mind you most 21st century GUI only
> > people would be freaked out by debug's
> > friendly user interface! "-" *HAHA*
>
> They should try 'edlin' if they want user friendly! Does Vista still
> have that?

edlin was always weak! debug was always
a great tool (as history shows us).
If you've got debug and a bit of
ingenuity you've got a bootstrap into
hax0r land.

4Q

Dustin Cook

"Ant" <not@home.today> wrote in
news:y_CdnYFaCMEvrsranZ2dnUVZ8sXinZ2d@brightview.c o.uk:

> "4Q" wrote:
>> Ant wrote:
>>> I've seen a some of your archived hex dumps of zipped web pages.
>>
>> Yes... Vista still has good old reliable
>> 'debug'
>
> Amazing. For some reason I thought MS had stopped supporting 16 bit
> apps on Vista.

Not so far. You can choose not to install support tho.

> They should try 'edlin' if they want user friendly! Does Vista still
> have that?

Next time im sitting on a vista box, I'll have a look...


--
Dustin Cook, Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2d
Email.: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com
Web...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
PGP...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bughunter.dustin.txt

Dustin Cook

"Ant" <not@home.today> wrote in
news:y_CdnYFaCMEvrsranZ2dnUVZ8sXinZ2d@brightview.c o.uk:

> "4Q" wrote:
>> Ant wrote:
>>> I've seen a some of your archived hex dumps of zipped web pages.
>>
>> Yes... Vista still has good old reliable
>> 'debug'
>
> Amazing. For some reason I thought MS had stopped supporting 16 bit
> apps on Vista.

Not so far. You can choose not to install support tho.

> They should try 'edlin' if they want user friendly! Does Vista still
> have that?

Next time im sitting on a vista box, I'll have a look...


--
Dustin Cook, Author of BugHunter - MalWare Removal Tool - v2.2d
Email.: bughunter.dustin@gmail.com
Web...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
Pad...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/pad.xml
PGP...: http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/bughunter.dustin.txt