![]() |
|
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: ATA to replace SPA-3000?
Martin Johnson schreef:
> Christian wrote: >>> My solution will be to get a Siemens C475IP or maybe the similar >>> SNOM M3. >> >> To be honest, that is exactly what I did (an S450IP in my case). The >> advantage of a real VOIP-phone rather than an ATA is that the sent and >> received signal never meet each other on a single line. The only echo >> will be caused acoustically in the handset. So the chance of echo on >> the far end is reduced quite a lot. I never had any complaints about >> echo anymore (I did have some with my SPA3000, although not often). > > I have a local PSTN number on my Gradwell VOIP service, so that PSTN > callers in my own town don't need to dial an area code to call me. > > After turning down the SPA3000 gain settings a while back, I _think_ I > only now get complaints about echo from callers in my own town, as if > BT's audio gain was higher for such callers. Is it possible that the > audio gain in the BT network is routing-dependent, or is it more likely > to just be coincidence? > > - Martin. You turning down the audio gain, makes BT turning it up ? isn't there a call-smart setting possible in your situation ? -- Bedankt, Thanks, The Fug. VoIP/SIP switched by: (A free service sponsored by ) |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: ATA to replace SPA-3000?
Jono wrote:
> Martin Johnson explained on 10/05/2008 : >> Christian wrote: >>>> My solution will be to get a Siemens C475IP or maybe the similar >>>> SNOM M3. >>> >>> To be honest, that is exactly what I did (an S450IP in my case). The >>> advantage of a real VOIP-phone rather than an ATA is that the sent >>> and received signal never meet each other on a single line. The only >>> echo will be caused acoustically in the handset. So the chance of >>> echo on the far end is reduced quite a lot. I never had any >>> complaints about echo anymore (I did have some with my SPA3000, >>> although not often). >> >> I have a local PSTN number on my Gradwell VOIP service, so that PSTN >> callers in my own town don't need to dial an area code to call me. > > Right, I've been reading this thread thinking you've got echo problems > on the PSTN side of the SPA3000. > > What you're actually saying is it's a VoIP account that's suffering the > echo.. Yes, since I mostly only use the VOIP account. In fact, the echo is much worse on calls to the analog BT line, but I only give out the VOIP number. |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: ATA to replace SPA-3000?
Martin Johnson used his keyboard to write :
> Jono wrote: >> Martin Johnson explained on 10/05/2008 : >>> Christian wrote: >>>>> My solution will be to get a Siemens C475IP or maybe the similar >>>>> SNOM M3. >>>> >>>> To be honest, that is exactly what I did (an S450IP in my case). The >>>> advantage of a real VOIP-phone rather than an ATA is that the sent and >>>> received signal never meet each other on a single line. The only echo >>>> will be caused acoustically in the handset. So the chance of echo on the >>>> far end is reduced quite a lot. I never had any complaints about echo >>>> anymore (I did have some with my SPA3000, although not often). >>> >>> I have a local PSTN number on my Gradwell VOIP service, so that PSTN >>> callers in my own town don't need to dial an area code to call me. >> >> Right, I've been reading this thread thinking you've got echo problems on >> the PSTN side of the SPA3000. >> >> What you're actually saying is it's a VoIP account that's suffering the >> echo.. > > Yes, since I mostly only use the VOIP account. I've got a couple of SPA3000s. Both are acting as PSTN trunks on my PBX and also as regular ATAs. I get the old echo on PSTN calls but not on VoIP calls. > > In fact, the echo is much worse on calls to the analog BT line, but I only > give out the VOIP number. Frustratingly so. |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: ATA to replace SPA-3000?
Jono wrote:
>> Martin Johnson explained on 10/05/2008 : >> In fact, the echo is much worse on calls to the analog BT line, but I >> only give out the VOIP number. > Frustratingly so. Well, at least it's not just my one that does that ;-) Now that I've found the "more echo cancellation" tickbox in the v3.x firmware, I will wait and see whether that solves or reduces the problem. I did have one PSTN call earlier, and it seemed OK, but then the thing always seems a bit intermittent. Cheers, - Martin. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
< Windows Help - MS Office Help - Hardware Support >
| New To Site? | Need Help? |