![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Getting Started! - Guide | Blog | Videos | Gallery | Members List | Social Groups | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
FSMO and Citrix
Hello,
Does anybody know, is there on Citrix some connetions for fsmo roles ? Examples.. do you have to prevent make citrix connection on dc which have some fsmo role like PDC etc.. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: FSMO and Citrix
Hello -=Ari=-,
Please describe what your real problem is and what you are trying to achive. CITRIX and FSMO have nothing to do with each other. Best regards Meinolf Weber Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > Hello, > Does anybody know, is there on Citrix some connetions for fsmo roles > ? > Examples.. do you have to prevent make citrix connection on dc which > have > some fsmo role like PDC etc.. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: FSMO and Citrix
Thanks Meinolf
Customer have FSMO DC1 -> Schema master, Domain Naming and PDC DC2 RID and Infra i think better fsmo placement is DC1 Schema and Domain Naming and PDC,RID and Infra to DC2 Customer ask to find out is there any reason that prevent to move PDC to DC2 there is Citrix "connection" or citrix use that server some way Ari "Meinolf Weber" wrote: > Hello -=Ari=-, > > Please describe what your real problem is and what you are trying to achive. > CITRIX and FSMO have nothing to do with each other. > > Best regards > > Meinolf Weber > Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers > no rights. > ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups > ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > > > Hello, > > Does anybody know, is there on Citrix some connetions for fsmo roles > > ? > > Examples.. do you have to prevent make citrix connection on dc which > > have > > some fsmo role like PDC etc.. > > > |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: FSMO and Citrix
Hello -=Ari=-,
FSMO roles are only relevant for DC's. Furthermore a TS/CITRIX installation shouldn't be done on DC's. If you have a single forest, single domain environment you can place the FSMO roles on any DC, doesn't matter if all on one or splitted. Also any DC can be GC server in this scenario. Best regards Meinolf Weber Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > Thanks Meinolf > > Customer have FSMO DC1 -> Schema master, Domain Naming and PDC DC2 RID > and Infra > > i think better fsmo placement is DC1 Schema and Domain Naming and > PDC,RID and Infra to DC2 > > Customer ask to find out is there any reason that prevent to move PDC > to DC2 there is Citrix "connection" or citrix use that server some way > > Ari > > "Meinolf Weber" wrote: > >> Hello -=Ari=-, >> >> Please describe what your real problem is and what you are trying to >> achive. CITRIX and FSMO have nothing to do with each other. >> >> Best regards >> >> Meinolf Weber >> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and >> confers >> no rights. >> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups >> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm >>> Hello, >>> Does anybody know, is there on Citrix some connetions for fsmo roles >>> ? >>> Examples.. do you have to prevent make citrix connection on dc which >>> have >>> some fsmo role like PDC etc.. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: FSMO and Citrix
I'am agree with you
i'am favour split FSMO also in single domain environment for performance and recovery case (emergency case is faster that you don't need to move all role or seize all role) not all eggs same basket. -Ari "Meinolf Weber" wrote: > Hello -=Ari=-, > > FSMO roles are only relevant for DC's. Furthermore a TS/CITRIX installation > shouldn't be done on DC's. If you have a single forest, single domain environment > you can place the FSMO roles on any DC, doesn't matter if all on one or splitted. > Also any DC can be GC server in this scenario. > > Best regards > > Meinolf Weber > Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers > no rights. > ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups > ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > > > Thanks Meinolf > > > > Customer have FSMO DC1 -> Schema master, Domain Naming and PDC DC2 RID > > and Infra > > > > i think better fsmo placement is DC1 Schema and Domain Naming and > > PDC,RID and Infra to DC2 > > > > Customer ask to find out is there any reason that prevent to move PDC > > to DC2 there is Citrix "connection" or citrix use that server some way > > > > Ari > > > > "Meinolf Weber" wrote: > > > >> Hello -=Ari=-, > >> > >> Please describe what your real problem is and what you are trying to > >> achive. CITRIX and FSMO have nothing to do with each other. > >> > >> Best regards > >> > >> Meinolf Weber > >> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and > >> confers > >> no rights. > >> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups > >> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > >>> Hello, > >>> Does anybody know, is there on Citrix some connetions for fsmo roles > >>> ? > >>> Examples.. do you have to prevent make citrix connection on dc which > >>> have > >>> some fsmo role like PDC etc.. > > > |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: FSMO and Citrix
I will disagree with the statement
-----you can place the FSMO roles on any DC, “doesn't matter if all on one or spitted” Knowing FSMO roles, understanding them is MUST, in my opinion. Splitting them is the best practice Simply, not having all the eggs in a same basket will prevent all the eggs get broken if anything happens to egg basket. I do not want to go in details but this is true, from experience and also is the MS best practice I do agree with not putting anything but .DIT database on a domain controller ( no other application ) http://smtp25.blogspot.com/2008/05/w...important.html best oz Ozugurlu -- Oz ozugurlu, Systems Engineer MCITP (EMA), MCITP (SA), MCSE 2003 M+ S+ MCDST Security Project+ Server+ oz@SMTP25.org http://smtp25.blogspot.com "-=Ari=-" wrote: > I'am agree with you > i'am favour split FSMO also in single domain environment for > performance and recovery case (emergency case is faster that you don't need > to move all role or seize all role) not all eggs same basket. > > -Ari > > "Meinolf Weber" wrote: > > > Hello -=Ari=-, > > > > FSMO roles are only relevant for DC's. Furthermore a TS/CITRIX installation > > shouldn't be done on DC's. If you have a single forest, single domain environment > > you can place the FSMO roles on any DC, doesn't matter if all on one or splitted. > > Also any DC can be GC server in this scenario. > > > > Best regards > > > > Meinolf Weber > > Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers > > no rights. > > ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups > > ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > > > > > Thanks Meinolf > > > > > > Customer have FSMO DC1 -> Schema master, Domain Naming and PDC DC2 RID > > > and Infra > > > > > > i think better fsmo placement is DC1 Schema and Domain Naming and > > > PDC,RID and Infra to DC2 > > > > > > Customer ask to find out is there any reason that prevent to move PDC > > > to DC2 there is Citrix "connection" or citrix use that server some way > > > > > > Ari > > > > > > "Meinolf Weber" wrote: > > > > > >> Hello -=Ari=-, > > >> > > >> Please describe what your real problem is and what you are trying to > > >> achive. CITRIX and FSMO have nothing to do with each other. > > >> > > >> Best regards > > >> > > >> Meinolf Weber > > >> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and > > >> confers > > >> no rights. > > >> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups > > >> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > > >>> Hello, > > >>> Does anybody know, is there on Citrix some connetions for fsmo roles > > >>> ? > > >>> Examples.. do you have to prevent make citrix connection on dc which > > >>> have > > >>> some fsmo role like PDC etc.. > > > > > > |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: FSMO and Citrix
Hello oztelnet25GmailcomNospamorg@discussions.microsoft. com,
It is no problem to have all FSMO roles on one machine, IF you have a single forest, single domain environment, like i wrote at the beginning. This is the case in this posting. I totally agree with you to know what roles are needed for what. And if one of the DC's go down and you have to seize the roles, it doesn't save you that amount of time if you have split them before. FSMO placement and optimization on Active Directory domain controllers http://support.microsoft.com/kb/223346/en-us Best regards Meinolf Weber Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > I will disagree with the statement > > -----you can place the FSMO roles on any DC, “doesn't matter if all on > one > or spitted” > Knowing FSMO roles, understanding them is MUST, in my opinion. > Splitting > them is the best practice > Simply, not having all the eggs in a same basket will prevent all the > eggs > get broken if anything happens to egg basket. I do not want to go in > details > but this is true, from experience and also is the MS best practice > I do agree with not putting anything but .DIT database on a domain > controller ( no other application ) > http://smtp25.blogspot.com/2008/05/w...st-important.h > tml > > best > oz Ozugurlu > http://smtp25.blogspot.com > > "-=Ari=-" wrote: > >> I'am agree with you >> i'am favour split FSMO also in single domain environment for >> performance and recovery case (emergency case is faster that you >> don't need >> to move all role or seize all role) not all eggs same basket. >> -Ari >> >> "Meinolf Weber" wrote: >> >>> Hello -=Ari=-, >>> >>> FSMO roles are only relevant for DC's. Furthermore a TS/CITRIX >>> installation shouldn't be done on DC's. If you have a single forest, >>> single domain environment you can place the FSMO roles on any DC, >>> doesn't matter if all on one or splitted. Also any DC can be GC >>> server in this scenario. >>> >>> Best regards >>> >>> Meinolf Weber >>> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and >>> confers >>> no rights. >>> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups >>> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm >>>> Thanks Meinolf >>>> >>>> Customer have FSMO DC1 -> Schema master, Domain Naming and PDC DC2 >>>> RID and Infra >>>> >>>> i think better fsmo placement is DC1 Schema and Domain Naming and >>>> PDC,RID and Infra to DC2 >>>> >>>> Customer ask to find out is there any reason that prevent to move >>>> PDC to DC2 there is Citrix "connection" or citrix use that server >>>> some way >>>> >>>> Ari >>>> >>>> "Meinolf Weber" wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello -=Ari=-, >>>>> >>>>> Please describe what your real problem is and what you are trying >>>>> to achive. CITRIX and FSMO have nothing to do with each other. >>>>> >>>>> Best regards >>>>> >>>>> Meinolf Weber >>>>> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, >>>>> and >>>>> confers >>>>> no rights. >>>>> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups >>>>> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> Does anybody know, is there on Citrix some connetions for fsmo >>>>>> roles >>>>>> ? >>>>>> Examples.. do you have to prevent make citrix connection on dc >>>>>> which >>>>>> have >>>>>> some fsmo role like PDC etc.. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: FSMO and Citrix
If you use dc2 for citrix i really doesn't recommand this to be domann
controller with pdc role as pdc will be the most busiest domain controller than the others. more over is always recommanded to install domain controller on the Severs which are secured enough not with ones installed with citrix or ts or any other applications. "Meinolf Weber" wrote: > Hello oztelnet25GmailcomNospamorg@discussions.microsoft. com, > > It is no problem to have all FSMO roles on one machine, IF you have a single > forest, single domain environment, like i wrote at the beginning. This is > the case in this posting. I totally agree with you to know what roles are > needed for what. > And if one of the DC's go down and you have to seize the roles, it doesn't > save you that amount of time if you have split them before. > > FSMO placement and optimization on Active Directory domain controllers > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/223346/en-us > > Best regards > > Meinolf Weber > Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers > no rights. > ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups > ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > > > I will disagree with the statement > > > > -----you can place the FSMO roles on any DC, “doesn't matter if all on > > one > > or spitted” > > Knowing FSMO roles, understanding them is MUST, in my opinion. > > Splitting > > them is the best practice > > Simply, not having all the eggs in a same basket will prevent all the > > eggs > > get broken if anything happens to egg basket. I do not want to go in > > details > > but this is true, from experience and also is the MS best practice > > I do agree with not putting anything but .DIT database on a domain > > controller ( no other application ) > > http://smtp25.blogspot.com/2008/05/w...st-important.h > > tml > > > > best > > oz Ozugurlu > > http://smtp25.blogspot.com > > > > "-=Ari=-" wrote: > > > >> I'am agree with you > >> i'am favour split FSMO also in single domain environment for > >> performance and recovery case (emergency case is faster that you > >> don't need > >> to move all role or seize all role) not all eggs same basket. > >> -Ari > >> > >> "Meinolf Weber" wrote: > >> > >>> Hello -=Ari=-, > >>> > >>> FSMO roles are only relevant for DC's. Furthermore a TS/CITRIX > >>> installation shouldn't be done on DC's. If you have a single forest, > >>> single domain environment you can place the FSMO roles on any DC, > >>> doesn't matter if all on one or splitted. Also any DC can be GC > >>> server in this scenario. > >>> > >>> Best regards > >>> > >>> Meinolf Weber > >>> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and > >>> confers > >>> no rights. > >>> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups > >>> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > >>>> Thanks Meinolf > >>>> > >>>> Customer have FSMO DC1 -> Schema master, Domain Naming and PDC DC2 > >>>> RID and Infra > >>>> > >>>> i think better fsmo placement is DC1 Schema and Domain Naming and > >>>> PDC,RID and Infra to DC2 > >>>> > >>>> Customer ask to find out is there any reason that prevent to move > >>>> PDC to DC2 there is Citrix "connection" or citrix use that server > >>>> some way > >>>> > >>>> Ari > >>>> > >>>> "Meinolf Weber" wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hello -=Ari=-, > >>>>> > >>>>> Please describe what your real problem is and what you are trying > >>>>> to achive. CITRIX and FSMO have nothing to do with each other. > >>>>> > >>>>> Best regards > >>>>> > >>>>> Meinolf Weber > >>>>> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, > >>>>> and > >>>>> confers > >>>>> no rights. > >>>>> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups > >>>>> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > >>>>>> Hello, > >>>>>> Does anybody know, is there on Citrix some connetions for fsmo > >>>>>> roles > >>>>>> ? > >>>>>> Examples.. do you have to prevent make citrix connection on dc > >>>>>> which > >>>>>> have > >>>>>> some fsmo role like PDC etc.. > > > |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
< Home - Windows Help - MS Office Help - Hardware Support >
| New To Site? | Need Help? |