Frank

Tiberius wrote:
> If blocked trolls Frank and Julie.. but since I saw their questions I place
> the answers here:
>
> Educating the vistaboys and vistagals for one more time....
>
> MS thought NTFS was fragment-proof and did not provide defragmentation tool
> -See second paragraph.

Hey bozo...supply "white paper" proof (if you have any idea what that
means) that MS didn't supply, nor ever intended to supply, a
defragmenting tool with any NTFS OS.
Frank

Frank

Doris Day - MFB wrote:

> Julie Smith wrote:
>
>
>>Soooo, can you give me a technical run down as to why linux handles
>>fragmentation better?
>>
>>I'd like to know... I'm serious.
>>
>
> This mailing list article should help explain it...
>
> https://listman.redhat.com/archives/.../msg00124.html
>
> A less geeky explanation :-)
>
> http://geekblog.oneandoneis2.org/ind..._defragmenting
>
>
> Love and Kisses,
> Doris
>

You're dumber than previously thought..."So this proves that Linux does
need defrag when the hard drive does not have enough gaps... So where
are the defrag utils for linux?"
Idiot!
Have a nice day you linux loser moron. :-D
Frank

Stephan Rose

Frank wrote:

> Doris Day - MFB wrote:
>
>> Julie Smith wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Soooo, can you give me a technical run down as to why linux handles
>>>fragmentation better?
>>>
>>>I'd like to know... I'm serious.
>>>
>>
>> This mailing list article should help explain it...
>>
>>
https://listman.redhat.com/archives/.../msg00124.html
>>
>> A less geeky explanation :-)
>>
>>
http://geekblog.oneandoneis2.org/ind..._defragmenting
>>
>>
>> Love and Kisses,
>> Doris
>>
>
> You're dumber than previously thought..."So this proves that Linux does
> need defrag when the hard drive does not have enough gaps... So where
> are the defrag utils for linux?"
> Idiot!
> Have a nice day you linux loser moron. :-D

Actually frank, and this applies to both Linux and Windows file systems,
when a disk goes past 80% space usage, no defragger will have an easy time.
Defragmentation may even be impossible as it requires a certain amount of
free space to work with.

So bottom line is that if someone can get a linux hard drive so full that it
starts to defragment, they need to start looking at a larger hard drive as
no defragger will really help all that much as it won't have enough free
space to work with.

And like I said, and I say it again, that also applies to your beloved NTFS.
The only difference is that NTFS will already start fragmenting at 1%
usage. =)

--
Stephan
2003 Yamaha R6

君のこと思い出す日なんてないのは
君のこと忘れたときがないから

Doris Day - MFB

Frank wrote:

> Doris Day - MFB wrote:
>
>> Julie Smith wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Soooo, can you give me a technical run down as to why linux handles
>>>fragmentation better?
>>>
>>>I'd like to know... I'm serious.
>>>
>>
>> This mailing list article should help explain it...
>>
>>
https://listman.redhat.com/archives/.../msg00124.html
>>
>> A less geeky explanation :-)
>>
>>
http://geekblog.oneandoneis2.org/ind..._defragmenting
>>
>>
>> Love and Kisses,
>> Doris
>>
>
> You're dumber than previously thought..."So this proves that Linux does
> need defrag when the hard drive does not have enough gaps... So where
> are the defrag utils for linux?"
> Idiot!
> Have a nice day you linux loser moron. :-D
> Frank

I see that you still haven't taken that reading comprehension course offered
to you in Grade 4. Please Frankie Boy, do take it. Then you won't look like
this ...

http://my.opera.com/salmondine/album...&picture=44229

Love and Kisses,
Doris



--
My Microsoft Hero (he loves this company!) ... http://tinyurl.com/yp9cn2
Installing: Windows vs Linux ... http://tinyurl.com/ywqmbw
BallmerBumBois: Frank, Julian, Richard Urban, Jupiter Jones, Harry Krause,
Feliks Dzerzhinsky
Sorry if I missed anyone, place your name here _________________.

Doris Day - MFB

Stephan Rose wrote:

> Frank wrote:
>
>> Doris Day - MFB wrote:
>>
>>> Julie Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Soooo, can you give me a technical run down as to why linux handles
>>>>fragmentation better?
>>>>
>>>>I'd like to know... I'm serious.
>>>>
>>>
>>> This mailing list article should help explain it...
>>>
>>>
>
https://listman.redhat.com/archives/.../msg00124.html
>>>
>>> A less geeky explanation :-)
>>>
>>>
>
http://geekblog.oneandoneis2.org/ind..._defragmenting
>>>
>>>
>>> Love and Kisses,
>>> Doris
>>>
>>
>> You're dumber than previously thought..."So this proves that Linux does
>> need defrag when the hard drive does not have enough gaps... So where
>> are the defrag utils for linux?"
>> Idiot!
>> Have a nice day you linux loser moron. :-D
>
> Actually frank, and this applies to both Linux and Windows file systems,
> when a disk goes past 80% space usage, no defragger will have an easy
> time. Defragmentation may even be impossible as it requires a certain
> amount of free space to work with.
>
> So bottom line is that if someone can get a linux hard drive so full that
> it starts to defragment, they need to start looking at a larger hard drive
> as no defragger will really help all that much as it won't have enough
> free space to work with.
>
> And like I said, and I say it again, that also applies to your beloved
> NTFS. The only difference is that NTFS will already start fragmenting at
> 1% usage. =)
>
Stephan,

All this is far beyond Frank's ability to understand. Maybe when he gets his
head out of his ass, there'll be some hope for him.

http://my.opera.com/salmondine/album...&picture=44229


Love and Kisses,
Doris


--
My Microsoft Hero (he loves this company!) ... http://tinyurl.com/yp9cn2
Installing: Windows vs Linux ... http://tinyurl.com/ywqmbw
BallmerBumBois: Frank, Julian, Richard Urban, Jupiter Jones, Harry Krause,
Feliks Dzerzhinsky
Sorry if I missed anyone, place your name here _________________.

Doris Day - MFB

Frank wrote:

> Tiberius wrote:
>> If blocked trolls Frank and Julie.. but since I saw their questions I
>> place the answers here:
>>
>> Educating the vistaboys and vistagals for one more time....
>>
>> MS thought NTFS was fragment-proof and did not provide defragmentation
>> tool -See second paragraph.
>
> Hey bozo...supply "white paper" proof (if you have any idea what that
> means) that MS didn't supply, nor ever intended to supply, a
> defragmenting tool with any NTFS OS.
> Frank

You Wintard. Windows NT didn't come with a defrag tool. Obviously,
MickeyMouse thought it wasn't necessary with NTFS. They learned differently
and with Win2000 started providing such a tool though crippled in its
capabilities which is so common with MickeyMouse provided software. Windows
NT users had to depend on third-party developers for defrag tools for NTFS.

Love and Kisses and a Big <snort>,
Doris

--
My Microsoft Hero (he loves this company!) ... http://tinyurl.com/yp9cn2
Installing: Windows vs Linux ... http://tinyurl.com/ywqmbw
BallmerBumBois: Frank, Julian, Richard Urban, Jupiter Jones, Harry Krause,
Feliks Dzerzhinsky
Sorry if I missed anyone, place your name here _________________.

Frank

Doris Day - MFB wrote:

> Frank wrote:
>
>
>>Tiberius wrote:
>>
>>>If blocked trolls Frank and Julie.. but since I saw their questions I
>>>place the answers here:
>>>
>>>Educating the vistaboys and vistagals for one more time....
>>>
>>>MS thought NTFS was fragment-proof and did not provide defragmentation
>>>tool -See second paragraph.
>>
>>Hey bozo...supply "white paper" proof (if you have any idea what that
>>means) that MS didn't supply, nor ever intended to supply, a
>>defragmenting tool with any NTFS OS.
>>Frank
>
>
> You Wintard. Windows NT didn't come with a defrag tool. Obviously,
> MickeyMouse thought it wasn't necessary with NTFS. They learned differently
> and with Win2000 started providing such a tool though crippled in its
> capabilities which is so common with MickeyMouse provided software. Windows
> NT users had to depend on third-party developers for defrag tools for NTFS.
>
> Love and Kisses and a Big <snort>,
> Doris
>


Reading comprehension not working you Linturd?
Read again ok, I was asking the "white paper".
Idiot.
(snort)
Frank

Frank

Doris Day - MFB wrote:

> Frank wrote:
>
>
>>Doris Day - MFB wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Julie Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Soooo, can you give me a technical run down as to why linux handles
>>>>fragmentation better?
>>>>
>>>>I'd like to know... I'm serious.
>>>>
>>>
>>>This mailing list article should help explain it...
>>>
>>>
>
> https://listman.redhat.com/archives/.../msg00124.html
>
>>>A less geeky explanation :-)
>>>
>>>
>
> http://geekblog.oneandoneis2.org/ind..._defragmenting
>
>>>
>>>Love and Kisses,
>>>Doris
>>>
>>
>>You're dumber than previously thought..."So this proves that Linux does
>>need defrag when the hard drive does not have enough gaps... So where
>>are the defrag utils for linux?"
>>Idiot!
>>Have a nice day you linux loser moron. :-D
>>Frank
>
>
> I see that you still haven't taken that reading comprehension course offered
> to you in Grade 4. Please Frankie Boy, do take it. Then you won't look like
> this ...
>
> http://my.opera.com/salmondine/album...&picture=44229
>
> Love and Kisses,
> Doris
>
>
>
You keep posting a self-portrait...you need help.
Frank

Tiberius

vista defrag is more crippled than XP's one...

and runs as a service and has a stupid useless gui (gui.. is an
exaggeration, its just a button!).. making sure your hard disk never
stops... lol

vista is stupid.



"Doris Day - MFB" <snort@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:1180455383.848905@netadmin1.interbaun.net...
> Frank wrote:
>
>> Tiberius wrote:
>>> If blocked trolls Frank and Julie.. but since I saw their questions I
>>> place the answers here:
>>>
>>> Educating the vistaboys and vistagals for one more time....
>>>
>>> MS thought NTFS was fragment-proof and did not provide defragmentation
>>> tool -See second paragraph.
>>
>> Hey bozo...supply "white paper" proof (if you have any idea what that
>> means) that MS didn't supply, nor ever intended to supply, a
>> defragmenting tool with any NTFS OS.
>> Frank
>
> You Wintard. Windows NT didn't come with a defrag tool. Obviously,
> MickeyMouse thought it wasn't necessary with NTFS. They learned
> differently
> and with Win2000 started providing such a tool though crippled in its
> capabilities which is so common with MickeyMouse provided software.
> Windows
> NT users had to depend on third-party developers for defrag tools for
> NTFS.
>
> Love and Kisses and a Big <snort>,
> Doris
>
> --
> My Microsoft Hero (he loves this company!) ... http://tinyurl.com/yp9cn2
> Installing: Windows vs Linux ... http://tinyurl.com/ywqmbw
> BallmerBumBois: Frank, Julian, Richard Urban, Jupiter Jones, Harry Krause,
> Feliks Dzerzhinsky
> Sorry if I missed anyone, place your name here _________________.
>
>
>
>

Tiberius

Doris.. just block him and get it over with..



"Doris Day - MFB" <snort@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:1180454081.511042@netadmin1.interbaun.net...
> Frank wrote:
>
>> Doris Day - MFB wrote:
>>
>>> Julie Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Soooo, can you give me a technical run down as to why linux handles
>>>>fragmentation better?
>>>>
>>>>I'd like to know... I'm serious.
>>>>
>>>
>>> This mailing list article should help explain it...
>>>
>>>
> https://listman.redhat.com/archives/.../msg00124.html
>>>
>>> A less geeky explanation :-)
>>>
>>>
> http://geekblog.oneandoneis2.org/ind..._defragmenting
>>>
>>>
>>> Love and Kisses,
>>> Doris
>>>
>>
>> You're dumber than previously thought..."So this proves that Linux does
>> need defrag when the hard drive does not have enough gaps... So where
>> are the defrag utils for linux?"
>> Idiot!
>> Have a nice day you linux loser moron. :-D
>> Frank
>
> I see that you still haven't taken that reading comprehension course
> offered
> to you in Grade 4. Please Frankie Boy, do take it. Then you won't look
> like
> this ...
>
> http://my.opera.com/salmondine/album...&picture=44229
>
> Love and Kisses,
> Doris
>
>
>
> --
> My Microsoft Hero (he loves this company!) ... http://tinyurl.com/yp9cn2
> Installing: Windows vs Linux ... http://tinyurl.com/ywqmbw
> BallmerBumBois: Frank, Julian, Richard Urban, Jupiter Jones, Harry Krause,
> Feliks Dzerzhinsky
> Sorry if I missed anyone, place your name here _________________.
>
>
>
>