![]() |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Is SyncToy 1.4 100% OK in Vista?
I ask because in Vista this aspect of SyncToy is driving me crazy: Even
though I've excluded the Recycle Bin in SyncToy's "Select Subfolders" section (the entire Recycle Bin branch is deselected), if I do a "Preview" on this task, SyncToy shows me that everything in Recycle Bin will be backed up. In other words, it flatly ignores the exclusion. I later tried deselecting some "normal" directories, and it had no problem with that, so is it possible that SyncToy has a problem with special folders (in Vista, at least)? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
RE: Is SyncToy 1.4 100% OK in Vista?
The only problems I have had with SyncToy have been with excessively long
paths, but I haven't tried what you're doing... Still, its better than Briefcase by a LONG way [They reinvented the wheel and came up with the log], and since MS didn't see fit to include Offline Files for Basic/Home/HP users it's the only way unless you use a 3rd party utility. Personally, SyncToy probably *saved* my sanity (though that may be a matter of debate) <g> Have you tried creating a new sync pair from (and maybe getting rid of existing SyncToy records) so it starts from scratch? Come to that, how did you specify the folder pair in such a way that it included recycle in the first place? (just rhetorical questions) Julian "Milhouse Van Houten" wrote: > I ask because in Vista this aspect of SyncToy is driving me crazy: Even > though I've excluded the Recycle Bin in SyncToy's "Select Subfolders" > section (the entire Recycle Bin branch is deselected), if I do a "Preview" > on this task, SyncToy shows me that everything in Recycle Bin will be backed > up. In other words, it flatly ignores the exclusion. I later tried > deselecting some "normal" directories, and it had no problem with that, so > is it possible that SyncToy has a problem with special folders (in Vista, at > least)? > > |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Is SyncToy 1.4 100% OK in Vista?
That's a good question, since I'm sure it's not common, but I stumbled upon
this issue because I happen to have a small, dedicated data drive and I wanted to operate upon the entire drive. So when setting up the sync pair (which I have tried doing from scratch) I chose the root instead of only a specific directory (of which there are many), which unfortunately includes the Recycle Bin. That's how I came to try to exclude the Recycle Bin and found that it looks like it can be done but doesn't actually work. I haven't been able to try it in XP. "Julian" <> wrote in message news:... > The only problems I have had with SyncToy have been with excessively long > paths, but I haven't tried what you're doing... > > Still, its better than Briefcase by a LONG way [They reinvented the wheel > and came up with the log], and since MS didn't see fit to include Offline > Files for Basic/Home/HP users it's the only way unless you use a 3rd party > utility. > > Personally, SyncToy probably *saved* my sanity (though that may be a > matter > of debate) <g> > > Have you tried creating a new sync pair from (and maybe getting rid of > existing SyncToy records) so it starts from scratch? Come to that, how did > you specify the folder pair in such a way that it included recycle in the > first place? (just rhetorical questions) > > Julian > > "Milhouse Van Houten" wrote: > >> I ask because in Vista this aspect of SyncToy is driving me crazy: Even >> though I've excluded the Recycle Bin in SyncToy's "Select Subfolders" >> section (the entire Recycle Bin branch is deselected), if I do a >> "Preview" >> on this task, SyncToy shows me that everything in Recycle Bin will be >> backed >> up. In other words, it flatly ignores the exclusion. I later tried >> deselecting some "normal" directories, and it had no problem with that, >> so >> is it possible that SyncToy has a problem with special folders (in Vista, >> at >> least)? >> >> |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Is SyncToy 1.4 100% OK in Vista?
I've been using the new SyncToy with Vista Business. Pairs are between the
C: and an external drive. So far I've had no problems. All all operations have worked flawlessly. Great little program. Hope you guys haven't found a flaw. "Milhouse Van Houten" <> wrote in message news:%.gbl... > That's a good question, since I'm sure it's not common, but I stumbled > upon this issue because I happen to have a small, dedicated data drive and > I wanted to operate upon the entire drive. So when setting up the sync > pair (which I have tried doing from scratch) I chose the root instead of > only a specific directory (of which there are many), which unfortunately > includes the Recycle Bin. That's how I came to try to exclude the Recycle > Bin and found that it looks like it can be done but doesn't actually work. > I haven't been able to try it in XP. > > "Julian" <> wrote in message > news:... >> The only problems I have had with SyncToy have been with excessively long >> paths, but I haven't tried what you're doing... >> >> Still, its better than Briefcase by a LONG way [They reinvented the wheel >> and came up with the log], and since MS didn't see fit to include Offline >> Files for Basic/Home/HP users it's the only way unless you use a 3rd >> party >> utility. >> >> Personally, SyncToy probably *saved* my sanity (though that may be a >> matter >> of debate) <g> >> >> Have you tried creating a new sync pair from (and maybe getting rid of >> existing SyncToy records) so it starts from scratch? Come to that, how >> did >> you specify the folder pair in such a way that it included recycle in the >> first place? (just rhetorical questions) >> >> Julian >> >> "Milhouse Van Houten" wrote: >> >>> I ask because in Vista this aspect of SyncToy is driving me crazy: Even >>> though I've excluded the Recycle Bin in SyncToy's "Select Subfolders" >>> section (the entire Recycle Bin branch is deselected), if I do a >>> "Preview" >>> on this task, SyncToy shows me that everything in Recycle Bin will be >>> backed >>> up. In other words, it flatly ignores the exclusion. I later tried >>> deselecting some "normal" directories, and it had no problem with that, >>> so >>> is it possible that SyncToy has a problem with special folders (in >>> Vista, at >>> least)? >>> >>> > |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Is SyncToy 1.4 100% OK in Vista?
The root of C? If so, are you saying that you were able to deselect the
Recycle Bin and have it honor that? If so, does "Preview" suggest otherwise? "mikeS" <> wrote in message news:.gbl... > I've been using the new SyncToy with Vista Business. Pairs are between > the C: and an external drive. So far I've had no problems. All all > operations have worked flawlessly. Great little program. Hope you guys > haven't found a flaw. > > "Milhouse Van Houten" <> wrote in message > news:%.gbl... >> That's a good question, since I'm sure it's not common, but I stumbled >> upon this issue because I happen to have a small, dedicated data drive >> and I wanted to operate upon the entire drive. So when setting up the >> sync pair (which I have tried doing from scratch) I chose the root >> instead of only a specific directory (of which there are many), which >> unfortunately includes the Recycle Bin. That's how I came to try to >> exclude the Recycle Bin and found that it looks like it can be done but >> doesn't actually work. I haven't been able to try it in XP. >> >> "Julian" <> wrote in message >> news:... >>> The only problems I have had with SyncToy have been with excessively >>> long >>> paths, but I haven't tried what you're doing... >>> >>> Still, its better than Briefcase by a LONG way [They reinvented the >>> wheel >>> and came up with the log], and since MS didn't see fit to include >>> Offline >>> Files for Basic/Home/HP users it's the only way unless you use a 3rd >>> party >>> utility. >>> >>> Personally, SyncToy probably *saved* my sanity (though that may be a >>> matter >>> of debate) <g> >>> >>> Have you tried creating a new sync pair from (and maybe getting rid of >>> existing SyncToy records) so it starts from scratch? Come to that, how >>> did >>> you specify the folder pair in such a way that it included recycle in >>> the >>> first place? (just rhetorical questions) >>> >>> Julian >>> >>> "Milhouse Van Houten" wrote: >>> >>>> I ask because in Vista this aspect of SyncToy is driving me crazy: Even >>>> though I've excluded the Recycle Bin in SyncToy's "Select Subfolders" >>>> section (the entire Recycle Bin branch is deselected), if I do a >>>> "Preview" >>>> on this task, SyncToy shows me that everything in Recycle Bin will be >>>> backed >>>> up. In other words, it flatly ignores the exclusion. I later tried >>>> deselecting some "normal" directories, and it had no problem with that, >>>> so >>>> is it possible that SyncToy has a problem with special folders (in >>>> Vista, at >>>> least)? >>>> >>>> >> > |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Is SyncToy 1.4 100% OK in Vista?
No, sorry for not being clear. Just selected folders from the C: to an
external drive. "Milhouse Van Houten" <> wrote in message news:.gbl... > The root of C? If so, are you saying that you were able to deselect the > Recycle Bin and have it honor that? If so, does "Preview" suggest > otherwise? > > "mikeS" <> wrote in message > news:.gbl... >> I've been using the new SyncToy with Vista Business. Pairs are between >> the C: and an external drive. So far I've had no problems. All all >> operations have worked flawlessly. Great little program. Hope you guys >> haven't found a flaw. >> >> "Milhouse Van Houten" <> wrote in message >> news:%.gbl... >>> That's a good question, since I'm sure it's not common, but I stumbled >>> upon this issue because I happen to have a small, dedicated data drive >>> and I wanted to operate upon the entire drive. So when setting up the >>> sync pair (which I have tried doing from scratch) I chose the root >>> instead of only a specific directory (of which there are many), which >>> unfortunately includes the Recycle Bin. That's how I came to try to >>> exclude the Recycle Bin and found that it looks like it can be done but >>> doesn't actually work. I haven't been able to try it in XP. >>> >>> "Julian" <> wrote in message >>> news:... >>>> The only problems I have had with SyncToy have been with excessively >>>> long >>>> paths, but I haven't tried what you're doing... >>>> >>>> Still, its better than Briefcase by a LONG way [They reinvented the >>>> wheel >>>> and came up with the log], and since MS didn't see fit to include >>>> Offline >>>> Files for Basic/Home/HP users it's the only way unless you use a 3rd >>>> party >>>> utility. >>>> >>>> Personally, SyncToy probably *saved* my sanity (though that may be a >>>> matter >>>> of debate) <g> >>>> >>>> Have you tried creating a new sync pair from (and maybe getting rid of >>>> existing SyncToy records) so it starts from scratch? Come to that, how >>>> did >>>> you specify the folder pair in such a way that it included recycle in >>>> the >>>> first place? (just rhetorical questions) >>>> >>>> Julian >>>> >>>> "Milhouse Van Houten" wrote: >>>> >>>>> I ask because in Vista this aspect of SyncToy is driving me crazy: >>>>> Even >>>>> though I've excluded the Recycle Bin in SyncToy's "Select Subfolders" >>>>> section (the entire Recycle Bin branch is deselected), if I do a >>>>> "Preview" >>>>> on this task, SyncToy shows me that everything in Recycle Bin will be >>>>> backed >>>>> up. In other words, it flatly ignores the exclusion. I later tried >>>>> deselecting some "normal" directories, and it had no problem with >>>>> that, so >>>>> is it possible that SyncToy has a problem with special folders (in >>>>> Vista, at >>>>> least)? >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Re: Can't uninstall Synctoy powertoy | Rheo | Windows XP | 6 | 11-02-2009 07:12 AM |
| SyncToy Scheduling | ilyaz | Windows XP | 0 | 16-08-2007 11:48 AM |
| Microsoft Synctoy | Dieter | Windows XP | 4 | 16-08-2007 11:31 AM |
< Windows Help - MS Office Help - Hardware Support >
| New To Site? | Need Help? |