![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ipod Party
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Ipod Party - *SPAM*
Casyo wrote:
spam Malke -- Elephant Boy Computers www.elephantboycomputers.com "Don't Panic!" MS-MVP Windows - Shell/User |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Ipod Party - *SPAM* - so is responding to every spam message
Malke <notreally@invalid.invalid> wrote in news:OH$i3BUMIHA.3516
@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl: > Casyo wrote: > > spam > > > Malke Do you really think you are helping the situation by doubling the spam? |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Ipod Party - *SPAM* - so is responding to every spam message
Look closer and you will see the spam was not doubled.
Malke took care to delete the original message in her post. -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar http://www.dts-l.org "nospam" <not@here.either> wrote in message news:Xns99F5B8BCDFE94nspauac@207.46.248.16... > Do you really think you are helping the situation by doubling the > spam? |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Ipod Party - *SPAM* - so is responding to every spam message
"Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in
news:OueZR9VMIHA.3916@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl: > Look closer and you will see the spam was not doubled. > Malke took care to delete the original message in her post. > The point was that I saw the spam, knew it was spam (as almost anyone would), and moved on without reading the message. Later, I saw the spam subject again (the doubling that I spoke of), because someone had to point out that the spam was spam. It was good that they didn't actually quote the spam message, but it would have been even better just to have left it unresponded to. I even feel guilty that I'm bothering to respond now, as others are seeing the spam subject yet again. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Ipod Party - *SPAM* - so is responding to every spam message
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:58:43 -0800, nospam <not@here.either> wrote:
>"Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in >news:OueZR9VMIHA.3916@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl: > >> Look closer and you will see the spam was not doubled. >> Malke took care to delete the original message in her post. >> > >The point was that I saw the spam, knew it was spam (as almost anyone >would), and moved on without reading the message. Later, I saw the spam >subject again (the doubling that I spoke of), because someone had to point >out that the spam was spam. It was good that they didn't actually quote >the spam message, but it would have been even better just to have left it >unresponded to. I even feel guilty that I'm bothering to respond now, as >others are seeing the spam subject yet again. Gee, what's with all the spam here lately ? ![]() |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|