Re: If you can't beat them, sue them.
 

Alias <aka@masked&anonymous.com.¡nval¡daditos> wrote in
news:i87ffv$n53$1@news.eternal-september.org:

> http://www.computerworld.com/s/artic.../Update_Micros
> oft_sues_Motorola_over_Android_phones
>
> Another example of MS trying to take it all and be the
> monopoly in smartphones where their market share is nil.
> Well, except for Frank, of course, who will buy the Win 7
> phone as soon as it's out.
>

".... The patents at issue relate to a range of functionality
embodied in Motorola’s Android smartphone devices that are
essential to the smartphone user experience, including
synchronizing email, calendars and contacts, scheduling
meetings, and notifying applications of changes in signal
strength and battery power...."

What a joke, patenets regarding synchronizing
email/calendars/contacts ?

IP patents are way out of hand. How many ways are there to sync
data like this ? ...'Is this data newer, or is that data...that
data is, so let's copy it to this device'... I can see if actual
MS source code is used somewhere, or binary libraries (.dll
files) "owned" by MS, but that's highly unlikely.

Re: If you can't beat them, sue them.
 

On 02/10/2010 6:45 PM, Alias wrote:
> On 10/02/2010 06:59 PM, DanS wrote:
>> Alias<aka@masked&anonymous.com.¡nval¡daditos> wrote in
>> news:i87ffv$n53$1@news.eternal-september.org:
>>
>>> http://www.computerworld.com/s/artic.../Update_Micros
>>> oft_sues_Motorola_over_Android_phones
>>>
>>> Another example of MS trying to take it all and be the
>>> monopoly in smartphones where their market share is nil.
>>> Well, except for Frank, of course, who will buy the Win 7
>>> phone as soon as it's out.
>>>
>>
>> ".... The patents at issue relate to a range of functionality
>> embodied in Motorola’s Android smartphone devices that are
>> essential to the smartphone user experience, including
>> synchronizing email, calendars and contacts, scheduling
>> meetings, and notifying applications of changes in signal
>> strength and battery power...."
>>
>> What a joke, patenets regarding synchronizing
>> email/calendars/contacts ?
>>
>> IP patents are way out of hand. How many ways are there to sync
>> data like this ? ...'Is this data newer, or is that data...that
>> data is, so let's copy it to this device'... I can see if actual
>> MS source code is used somewhere, or binary libraries (.dll
>> files) "owned" by MS, but that's highly unlikely.
>>
>>
>
> Like I said, MS can't beat them technologically so they sue them.
> Course, stupid lawsuits like these can only happen in a backwards
> country like the USA where you can sue someone for almost anything.
>

So, the dingbat's an expert on Phone 7 technology, now, is he? Great
stuff from a clown who's never even seen let alone tried this phone,
which is likely to top the iPhone sales this Christmas.

Re: If you can't beat them, sue them.
 

On 02/10/2010 7:42 PM, Alias wrote:
> On 10/02/2010 08:32 PM, Boscoe wrote:
>> On 02/10/2010 6:45 PM, Alias wrote:
>>> On 10/02/2010 06:59 PM, DanS wrote:
>>>> Alias<aka@masked&anonymous.com.¡nval¡daditos> wrote in
>>>> news:i87ffv$n53$1@news.eternal-september.org:
>>>>
>>>>> http://www.computerworld.com/s/artic.../Update_Micros
>>>>> oft_sues_Motorola_over_Android_phones
>>>>>
>>>>> Another example of MS trying to take it all and be the
>>>>> monopoly in smartphones where their market share is nil.
>>>>> Well, except for Frank, of course, who will buy the Win 7
>>>>> phone as soon as it's out.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ".... The patents at issue relate to a range of functionality
>>>> embodied in Motorola’s Android smartphone devices that are
>>>> essential to the smartphone user experience, including
>>>> synchronizing email, calendars and contacts, scheduling
>>>> meetings, and notifying applications of changes in signal
>>>> strength and battery power...."
>>>>
>>>> What a joke, patenets regarding synchronizing
>>>> email/calendars/contacts ?
>>>>
>>>> IP patents are way out of hand. How many ways are there to sync
>>>> data like this ? ...'Is this data newer, or is that data...that
>>>> data is, so let's copy it to this device'... I can see if actual
>>>> MS source code is used somewhere, or binary libraries (.dll
>>>> files) "owned" by MS, but that's highly unlikely.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Like I said, MS can't beat them technologically so they sue them.
>>> Course, stupid lawsuits like these can only happen in a backwards
>>> country like the USA where you can sue someone for almost anything.
>>>
>>
>> So, the dingbat's an expert on Phone 7 technology, now, is he?
>
> I wouldn't know. Ask the dingbat Frank.
>
>> Great
>> stuff from a clown who's never even seen let alone tried this phone,
>> which is likely to top the iPhone sales this Christmas.
>
> You mean like how Zune beat iPod and the Kin beat the iPhone3?


I mean like the integration with Xbox Live?

Re: If you can't beat them, sue them.
 

Frank <fb@win7x32.esd> wrote in
news:4ca767c4$1@news.x-privat.org:

> On 10/2/2010 9:59 AM, DanS wrote:
>> Alias<aka@masked&anonymous.com.¡nval¡daditos> wrote in
>> news:i87ffv$n53$1@news.eternal-september.org:
>>
>>> http://www.computerworld.com/s/artic...80/Update_Micr
>>> os oft_sues_Motorola_over_Android_phones
>>>
>>> Another example of MS trying to take it all and be the
>>> monopoly in smartphones where their market share is nil.
>>> Well, except for Frank, of course, who will buy the Win 7
>>> phone as soon as it's out.
>>>
>>
>> ".... The patents at issue relate to a range of
>> functionality embodied in Motorola’s Android smartphone
>> devices that are essential to the smartphone user
>> experience, including synchronizing email, calendars and
>> contacts, scheduling meetings, and notifying applications
>> of changes in signal strength and battery power...."
>>
>> What a joke, patenets regarding synchronizing
>> email/calendars/contacts ?
>>
>> IP patents are way out of hand. How many ways are there to
>> sync data like this ? ...'Is this data newer, or is that
>> data...that data is, so let's copy it to this device'... I
>> can see if actual MS source code is used somewhere, or
>> binary libraries (.dll files) "owned" by MS, but that's
>> highly unlikely.
>>
>>
> I guess you too, like alias, failed to read the complete
> article.

I read the entire article Karnac-hole.

I stated my opinion.

Have you got something at least relatively intelligent to say
to counter my opinion that IP patents are getting way out of
hand ?

Something even intelligent relevant to a monkey ?

I'm sure you don't.

Re: So babba had a "headache" last night, right?...LOL!
 

On Sat, 02 Oct 2010 12:32:51 -0700, Frank scrawled:

> The only reason I can think of for you being so hateful and so
> arrogantly stupid is that babba, your male sheep lover, had a "headache"
> last night.

Here's yer theme song, franky boy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCRE9qOgbug



--
Computer says: "No"

Re: If you can't beat them, sue them.
 

Frank <fab@U64.esd> wrote in news:4ca7a34e@news.x-privat.org:

> On 10/2/2010 2:11 PM, DanS wrote:
>> Frank<fb@win7x32.esd> wrote in
>> news:4ca767c4$1@news.x-privat.org:
>>
>>> On 10/2/2010 9:59 AM, DanS wrote:
>>>> Alias<aka@masked&anonymous.com.¡nval¡daditos> wrote in
>>>> news:i87ffv$n53$1@news.eternal-september.org:
>>>>
>>>>> http://www.computerworld.com/s/artic...9180/Update_Mi
>>>>> cr os oft_sues_Motorola_over_Android_phones
>>>>>

<SNIP>

>> I'm sure you don't.
>>
> The only thing you're sure about when it comes to me is
> that I always kick your lamers, diatribing ass.
> Oops!
> Now go **** your monkey, you cock sucking son of a bitch!

So I understand what you're saying......

You're saying that you are moron idiot that can do nothing but
spew filth and garbage and can't come up with an intelligent
thought.

I've known that all along.

It's nice that you prove it to everyone. They've known it all
along anyway, but thanks for giving a shining example of one
of your most intelligent counterpoints yet.

Of course, most have kf'd you already because they know you
are nothing but a vile pile of dog puke and are capable of
nothing that is socially acceptable.

Apparently, nothing changes you diseased wanker.

Re: porko is feeling left out!
 

On Sat, 02 Oct 2010 16:32:09 -0700, Frank wrote:

> On 10/2/2010 2:31 PM, Parko wrote:
>> On Sat, 02 Oct 2010 12:32:51 -0700, Frank scrawled:
>>
>>> The only reason I can think of for you being so hateful and so
>>> arrogantly stupid is that babba, your male sheep lover, had a
>>> "headache" last night.
>>
>> Here's yer theme song, franky boy:
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCRE9qOgbug
>>
>>
>>
> What's wrong, porko...feeling left out? OK, this ones just for you. Go
> **** yourself *******!
> Got it?

Bestiality, then homo***uality. Wanna go for a trifecta, Mr. I'll take-it-
up-the-arse-but-only-if-I-can-wear-the-fleece.



--
Oh, bugger!

Re: If you can't beat them, sue them.
 

On Sat, 02 Oct 2010 22:17:53 -0500, DanS wrote:

> Of course, most have kf'd you already because they know you are nothing
> but a vile pile of dog puke

Don't insult dogs, they're useful.

--
Oh, bugger!

Re: If you can't beat them, sue them.
 

On 10/02/2010 03:11 PM, DanS wrote:
> Frank<fb@win7x32.esd> wrote in
> news:4ca767c4$1@news.x-privat.org:
>
>> On 10/2/2010 9:59 AM, DanS wrote:
>>> Alias<aka@masked&anonymous.com.¡nval¡daditos> wrote in
>>> news:i87ffv$n53$1@news.eternal-september.org:
>>>
>>>> http://www.computerworld.com/s/artic...80/Update_Micr
>>>> os oft_sues_Motorola_over_Android_phones
>>>>
>>>> Another example of MS trying to take it all and be the
>>>> monopoly in smartphones where their market share is nil.
>>>> Well, except for Frank, of course, who will buy the Win 7
>>>> phone as soon as it's out.
>>>>
>>>
>>> ".... The patents at issue relate to a range of
>>> functionality embodied in Motorola’s Android smartphone
>>> devices that are essential to the smartphone user
>>> experience, including synchronizing email, calendars and
>>> contacts, scheduling meetings, and notifying applications
>>> of changes in signal strength and battery power...."
>>>
>>> What a joke, patenets regarding synchronizing
>>> email/calendars/contacts ?
>>>
>>> IP patents are way out of hand. How many ways are there to
>>> sync data like this ? ...'Is this data newer, or is that
>>> data...that data is, so let's copy it to this device'... I
>>> can see if actual MS source code is used somewhere, or
>>> binary libraries (.dll files) "owned" by MS, but that's
>>> highly unlikely.
>>>
>>>
>> I guess you too, like alias, failed to read the complete
>> article.
>
> I read the entire article Karnac-hole.
>
> I stated my opinion.
>
> Have you got something at least relatively intelligent to say
> to counter my opinion that IP patents are getting way out of
> hand ?
>
> Something even intelligent relevant to a monkey ?
>
> I'm sure you don't.

Notice how Frank omits the closing statement:

"Gold questioned the timing of the Motorola suit. "If you're going out
and suing everyone and you're about to release a new OS, what's going to
grab the headlines? You want your new OS to, not the lawsuit," he said."

It's all about Microsoft and it's failings. They always sue when they
are falling behind or are running scared, nothing new. They, as usual
shoot themselves in the foot whining, crying, and throwing around
lawsuits. What is hilarious is they fool mostly no one, but make
themselves look bad and alienate the very customers they wish to obtain,
by their underhanded tactics. It's always amusing to watch them try to
bully, and strong-arm their way to monopolize, EVERYTHING, and then fail
miserably in areas, save their beloved OS. Even more hilarious, is
companies like Novell, that are stupid enough to cave-in. ..Spineless,
Gutless, Wonders. MS has a pathetic loosing record as they should with
lawsuits, so why cave-in? Challenge them, (Or take on the challenge),
and WIN. The ultimate hilarity is watching MS loose lawsuit after
lawsuit as a result of STEALING technology, (Their usual M.O.), over and
over again. Frank also conveniently omitted this:

"In a statement, Motorola said it had not received a copy of the
complaint. "Motorola has a leading intellectual property portfolio, one
of the strongest in the industry. The company will vigorously defend
itself in this matter," it said."

Cheers to Motorola for stepping up to the plate and challanging the PIG.
I have little doubt Motorola will prevail. Live with it MS Zealots, MS
is NOT the be-all, far from it in various areas. ..And mostly are thugs,
claiming they did what someone else actually did. (Stole it) ..Yet they
have the "balls" to sue over something they never developed themselves
in the first place in many cases. Their record from the very beginning
is stealing or paying very LITTLE for technology they couldn't develop
themselves. It's a FACT, Zealots just simply refuse to accept and will
deny to their last breath. ..But we people that have been around a while
and have paid attention, KNOW better.

...Enter the bluster and denial, not to mention vulgar statements I'll
ignore as usual.. Blow all the hot air you want, it falls on def ears. I
couldn't care less about MS Zealot rants, it means nothing as usual.
Just paid MS shilling/astroturfing rants.. Nothing new from a less than
honest company and it's advocates.

G'day

Re: DanS and his diseased money wanker!...LOL!
 

>> It's nice that you prove it to everyone. They've known it
>> all along anyway, but thanks for giving a shining example
>> of one of your most intelligent counterpoints yet.
>
> "Counterpoint"? Hell, there is no "counterpoint" seeing as
> how you didn't even make a "point" in the first place.
> Dumb-ass!

Yes I did....here it is again.

"IP patents are way out of hand. How many ways are there to sync
data like this ? ...'Is this data newer, or is that data...that
data is, so let's copy it to this device'... I can see if actual
MS source code is used somewhere, or binary libraries (.dll
files) "owned" by MS, but that's highly unlikely.

....from my first post in the thread.